IPP> "Set-2" requirements - correct URL

[harryl at us.ibm.com]

Correct URL

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/PWG-Drafts/ipp-ext-req-990831.PDF

Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
harryl at us.ibm.com


harryl at us.ibm.com on 08/31/99 04:20:14 PM

To:   ipp at pwg.org
cc:   bwagner at digprod.com, Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM at IBMUS,
      cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.coM
Subject:  IPP> "Set-2" requirements







I don't like the topic "admin" I think it's misleading. This is colloquially how
we've referred to it. I'd like to start using "Set-2" instead.

I also don't really think a new requirements or justification is necessary
(w.r.t. Carl's proposal) after reviewing the existing design goals.
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/published-ipp-rfcs/rfc2567.txt

However, at the last PWG meeting I said I would write some justification related
to the proposal. I'm not sure I hit the mark but I've made an attempt.
Hopefully, we can use this document for discussion at the conference call
tomorrow and make some progress on acceptance of the proposed Set-2 extensions.
ftp://pwg@ftp.pwg.org/export/home/ftp/pub/pwg/ipp/PWG-Drafts/ipp-ext-req-990831.PDF



Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
harryl at us.ibm.com