IPP> NOT - ISSUE 2 - Should we make 'http:' notification method REQUIR ED?

IPP> NOT - ISSUE 2 - Should we make 'http:' notification method REQUIR ED?

Hastings, Tom N hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com
Wed May 19 12:30:37 EDT 1999

Previous message: IPP> NOT - ISSUE 1 - can event reporting be dropped if device is too b usy?
Next message: IPP> not - ISSUE 7 - Should each subscription have a running event cou nter?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

	ISSUE 2 - Should we make the 'http' notification method (using POST)
REQUIRED, instead of 'ipp-tcp-notify' and 'ipp-udp-notify'?  Then we don't
need to register anything for the REQUIRED method.

Previous message: IPP> NOT - ISSUE 1 - can event reporting be dropped if device is too b usy?
Next message: IPP> not - ISSUE 7 - Should each subscription have a running event cou nter?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Ipp mailing list