IPP> FW: New I-D Boilerplate

[Manros, Carl-Uno B]

Editors,

More details on the new template.

I suggest that we will use the first formulation. We also need to check that
we are indeed
following RFC 2026.

Carl-Uno

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Coya [mailto:scoya at ietf.org] 
Sent: Friday, January 29, 1999 8:40 AM
To: wgchairs at ietf.org
Subject: New I-D Boilerplate



Greetings,

I recently posted a message to the announcement list informing folks that
the I-D guidelines document has been updated, and that all I-D submissions
need to incorporate what's in guidelines.

The specific change pertains to the first line of the boilerplate text:

=======================================================================
All Internet-Drafts should begin with ONE of the following three
statements:

	This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance
	with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.

	This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance
	with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 except for the
	right to produce derivative works.

	This document is an Internet-Draft and is NOT offered in
	accordance with Section 10 of RFC2026, and will only exist as
	an Internet-Draft.


Any submission which does not include one (and only one) of the above
three statements will be returned to the submitter. The IETF Secretariat
will NOT add this text.


=======================================================================

I'm explicitly bringing this to your attention. You should be aware of the
requirement, and I expect most of you will want to check out which line is
used prior to accepting an document as a work ite of the WG.


Steve