I agree that the 'queued-for-marker' job state reason should also be usable
with the 'processing' job state. Some developers from our company also sent
me the same comment by email privately during the meeting.
So ok if we include the 'processing' state as one of the job states with
which an implementation MAY use the new 'queued-for-marker' job state
reason?
Thanks,
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: harryl at us.ibm.com [mailto:harryl at us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 16:15
To: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: IPP> Queued for marking
In New Orleans, we introduced a new job state reason ("queued-for-marker")
for jobs that are interpreted (or maybe don't need interpreting... like
TIFF) but "pending", "pending-held". This was a long and excruciating
discussion which warped abruptly. I want to say that I feel this new
job-state-reaons should apply to the "processing" state as well.
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
harryl at us.ibm.com