Harry,
In my analysis, the submitter would always have the ability to request a
notification of job completion. He also could elect to not receive
notification.
The local user is always the recipient of the printed document and also
should always receive notification of, at least, job completion.
(After thinking about your question and my response, did you interpret "He
is always the recipient of the document." to mean "...the notification."?)
Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.
On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, Harry Lewis wrote:
> Ron, I agree with your qualifications of the notification
> requirements. I'm not sure I understand this one, however:
>> > The local user may or may not be the submitter of the document
> > to be printed. He is always the recipient of the document.
>> Can you please elaborate? Unless (and perhaps even if) the submitter
> is capable of directing notification to a specific recipient, as suggested
> by Charles Gordon in another thread (Three Types of Notification).
>> >2. Notifying the intended receiver of the job that he has a new job at
> >the printer.
>> I would always think of the submitter as wanting notification.
>> Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
>>