> Carl-Uno, Bob, and I have conferred and we will clarify that section 9.3 is
> a failure response because "ipp-attribute-fidelity" is 'true'
Hmmm... Unless I'm missing it somehow, the current example doesn't specify
"ipp-attribute-fidelity", so the Printer MUST(? SHOULD?) assume a value of
'false', right?
Otherwise, your resolution looks good to me!
-Carl
hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com on 11/17/98 01:46:41 PM
Please respond to hastings at cp10.es.xerox.com
To: robert.herriot at eng.sun.com, Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM at ibmus
cc: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP>PRO latest encoding document: 9.3 Print-Job Response
Carl,
Glad you are checking the examples!
Carl-Uno, Bob, and I have conferred and we will clarify that section 9.3 is
a failure response because "ipp-attribute-fidelity" is 'true' with "copies"
= 20 value not supported and the "sides" attribute not supported.
Therefore, no job is created, no job-id or job-uri is returned, and the
error code returned is 'client-error-attributes-or-values-not-supported'
(0x040B) [not successful-ok-ignored-or-substituted-attributes (0x0001)].
Then we will add a new section right after it to show the response for
"ipp-attribute-fidelity" is 'false' and the same copy=20 value not supported
and the "sides" attribute not supported. Here the request is accepted, the
job is created, the "job-Id" and "job-uri" operation attributes are
returned, and the status code is
'successful-ok-ignored-or-substituted-attributes' (0x0001). Note that the
Unsupported Attributes Group returned in the response is the same for both
examples.
Tom
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carl Kugler [mailto:kugler at us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 11:24
>To: ipp at pwg.org>Subject: Re: IPP>PRO latest encoding document: 9.3 Print-Job Response
>(failure)
>>>Section 9.3, "Print-Job Response (failure)", presents an
>example of a Print-Job response which fails because the
>printer does not support sides and because the value 20 for
>copies is not supported. It shows a status-code of
>client-error-bad-request (0x0400). Shouldn't that really be
>successful-ok-ignored-or-substituted-attributes (0x0001)?
>> -Carl
>>-----
>See the original message at http://www.egroups.com/list/ipp/?start=4886>