>I'm with Carl on this one. The current mechanism for specifying and =
> deriving the natural language of a given attribute is error prone (and in =
> my opinion, an overkill - we've supported multi-language print environments=
> for some time now without the capability for overriding language ant the =
> granularity described in IPP and haven't once received a hard requirement =
> from our customers to do so.) Whatever we can do to make it simpler, I'm =
> in favor of.
>> -Hugo=20
>I would just like to point out that there is no loss in granularity with my proposal. It's just a simpler and more efficient way to do get the same results.
-----
See the original message at http://www.egroups.com/list/ipp/?start=4625
--
Free e-mail group hosting at http://www.eGroups.com/