At 08:41 AM 5/20/98 PDT, you wrote:
>Is anyone keeping track of outstanding issues with IPP 1.0, or has the group
>moved on to IPP 2.0 completely? I'm looking for something like
>>http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Issues/>>for example. Some specific issues I'm wondering about as we continue
>implementation and interoperability testing:
>>1. "printer-uri" or "job-uri" mandatory and required op att? Form?
>2. Mixed case allowed in 'naturalLanguage' and 'charset' values?
>3. 'client-error-request-uri-too-long' vs.
>'client-error-request-value-too-long' ? Types applied to?
>4. "attributes-charset" and "attributes-natural-language" must always be
>positioned up front?
>>Are these still outstanding issues or have they been resolved and I've missed
>something?
>> -Carl
>
Carl,
A very good question. I have tried for the last couple of PWG meetings to
get somebody to take on this job, but so far nobody has stood up to take it
on. I do not know if anything happened on this in the PWG meeting last week.
Carl-Uno
Carl-Uno Manros
Principal Engineer - Advanced Printing Standards - Xerox Corporation
701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
Email: manros at cp10.es.xerox.com