We did talk about future IPPv2 encodings and transports, but no formal
WG concensus was declared since it wouldn't have been appropriate when
we don't even have version 1.0 documents at "proposed" yet.
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Moore [SMTP:paulmo at microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 1998 4:16 PM
To: 'imcdonal at eso.mc.xerox.com'; jkm at underscore.com
Cc: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: RE: IPP> MOD/PRO - simple proposal for providing
dictionary-like capability
As I said below - this was an informal consensus. Everybody I
spoke to about
it said that they thought that we would have to do XML to handle
things like
dictionaries, etc.
Yes it completely breaks compatability - this is why I raised
the issue as
strongly as I did. I still think that the Maui decision was
wrong (but that
is water under the bridge now).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: imcdonal at eso.mc.xerox.com
[SMTP:imcdonal at eso.mc.xerox.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 1998 4:17 PM
> To: jkm at underscore.com; Paul Moore
> Cc: ipp at pwg.org
> Subject: Re: IPP> MOD/PRO - simple proposal for providing
> dictionary-like capability
>
> Hi Jay and Paul,
>
> Yes, I'm interested to hear more about the 'decision' to do
> IPPv2 on XML in Maui. It sure didn't widely penetrate the
> mailing list for the rest of us people. And it sure TOTALLY
> breaks backward compatibility.
>
> Cheers,
> - Ira McDonald (High North)
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> [Jay's note]
> From ipp-owner at pwg.org Wed Apr 1 15:37:41 1998
> Return-Path: <ipp-owner at pwg.org>
> Received: from zombi (zombi.eso.mc.xerox.com) by
snorkel.eso.mc.xerox.com
> (4.1/XeroxClient-1.1)
> id AA19155; Wed, 1 Apr 98 15:37:40 EST
> Received: from alpha.xerox.com by zombi (4.1/SMI-4.1)
> id AA24661; Wed, 1 Apr 98 15:31:25 EST
> Received: from lists.underscore.com ([199.125.85.30]) by
alpha.xerox.com
> with SMTP id <52295(4)>; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 12:31:32 PST
> Received: from localhost (daemon at localhost) by
lists.underscore.com
> (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA16498 for
<imcdonal at eso.mc.xerox.com>; Wed,
> 1 Apr 1998 15:28:01 -0500 (EST)
> Received: by pwg.org (bulk_mailer v1.5); Wed, 1 Apr 1998
15:20:22 -0500
> Received: (from daemon at localhost) by lists.underscore.com
(8.7.5/8.7.3) id
> PAA15724 for ipp-outgoing; Wed, 1 Apr 1998 15:20:09 -0500
(EST)
> Message-Id: <3522A16D.757A81B1 at underscore.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 1998 12:19:57 PST
> From: Jay Martin <jkm at underscore.com>
> Organization: Underscore, Inc.
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (WinNT; I)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> To: Paul Moore <paulmo at microsoft.com>
> Cc: ipp at pwg.org
> Subject: Re: IPP> MOD/PRO - simple proposal for providing
dictionary-like
> capability
> References:
>
<5CEA8663F24DD111A96100805FFE6587030BC41B at red-msg-51.dns.microsoft.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Sender: ipp-owner at pwg.org
> Status: R
>
> Paul,
>
> Sorry, but I wasn't able to attend the Maui meeting, so
perhaps
> you can clarify something about the perceptions of "IPP v2"
> for me.
>
> The way I read your message (below), IPP v2 will have a
totally
> different encoding than IPP v1 (ie, non-standard BER-like
> quasi-binary encoding vs. structured text).
>
> Is this correct?
>
> ...jay
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- JK Martin | Email: jkm at underscore.com
--
> -- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000
--
> -- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699
--
> -- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web:
http://www.underscore.com --
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------