IPP> MOD - URGENT: Ok to call 2nd printer uri: "printer-map-uri"?

IPP> MOD - URGENT: Ok to call 2nd printer uri: "printer-map-uri"?

Ron Bergman rbergma at dpc.com
Thu Dec 18 13:08:14 EST 1997


Tom,


I agree with the other responses that "map" is not a very descriptive (and
could be confusing) term.  I would vote for "printer-tls-uri"  but the
first ("printer-secure-uri") is still better than "printer-map-uri"


	Ron Bergman
	Dataproducts Corp.




On Wed, 17 Dec 1997, Tom Hastings wrote:


> In Washington and before, there has been discussion that calling
> the second uri, "printer-secure-uri" makes it sound like the first
> "printer-uri" is not secure.  So we've been searching for a better
> term.
> 
> Scott and Steve came up with the term (drum roll): 
> 
>    "Mutual Authentication and Privacy (MAP).
> 
> So ok to call the second uri Printer attribute: "printer-map-uri"?
> 
> It will be put right after the first uri: "printer-uri" secion
> 4.4.2 in the Model document.
> 
> SEND COMMENTS TO DL, SO WE CAN FORWARD THE INTERNET-DRAFT THIS WEEK
> TO THE IESG.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
> 



More information about the Ipp mailing list
Our website uses cookies on your device to give you the best user experience. By using our website, you agree to the placement of these cookies. To learn more, read our privacy policy. Read Privacy Policy