Sorry... my message got truncated somehow...
>> MAKING every IPP printer behave in a secure fashion could be mislead=
ing
>>I'm curious why this would be misleading...
What I tried to say is that if the data is sensitive enough to require =
a
secure socket, it's likely the printer should also be, physically, in a=
secure
area. If every IPP printer must support HTTPS (for example) then one co=
uld
easily be duped into thinking they were engaged in "secure printing" wh=
en,
indeed, they are not.
Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
=