I sent the following on Friday. I hope that we all agree the two paragraphs
below.
So, I think that we are in agreement that the model and protocol documents
should state that the operations whose target is a Printer shall include
a parameter called printer-uri and operations whose target is a job shall
include a parameter called job-uri.
Randy suggests that the value of job-uri/printer-uri could differ from
the request-uri on the HTTP Request-Line, but the model has no such
concept. So unless there are strong arguments to the contrary, the
protocol document will state that the request-uri has the same value
as the printer-uri/job-uri in the operation.
Bob Herriot
> From rdebry at us.ibm.com Mon Jul 21 10:34:32 1997
> From: Roger K Debry <rdebry at us.ibm.com>
> To: <ipp at pwg.org>
> Subject: IPP>MOD - Job Identifier
> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 13:24:50 -0400
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Sender: ipp-owner at pwg.org> X-Lines: 16
>> There has been a lot of discussion on the proposal made by Paul Moore on the
> use of Job URL.
> Unfortunately, there is no way to know if we really have consensus on the
> proposal. I'd like to
> see a re-statement of what we believe the agreed to changes are and some poll
> of the discussion
> list to see if we have a consensus. Would Bob and/or Paul be willing to do
> this?
>>> Roger K deBry
> Senior Techncial Staff Member
> Architecture and Technology
> IBM Printing Systems
> email: rdebry at us.ibm.com> phone: 1-303-924-4080
>