> From paulmo at microsoft.com Wed Apr 9 14:54:51 1997
>> In the current model draft the behaviour of job-name is quite different
> to that specfied in ISO 10175. In 10175 the job-name is supplied by the
> client and is effectively a comment (9.2.1.5). In IPP it is specified as
> being generated by the printer (5.3.2.4).
>> The meaning and semantics of attributes with the same name in both
> documents should be the same.
>
At the Austin meeting (if I remember correctly), we went back to the
more common semantics for job-name, namely those of DPA and lpd.
Bob Herriot