A few comments to Steve's comments.
Carl-Uno
At 09:55 PM 3/11/97 PST, Stephen Zilles wrote:
>I thought that handling driver download was not a V1.0 feature
CBM> It is certainly not on Version 1.0
>I am not sure why there are a number of different scenarios for the
>failure of a print job: 8.8, 8.10, 8.12, 8.18. Should not these all be
>one scenario (which could talk about different return information)?
CBM> Useful simplification
>I think that server pull for long jobs (8.17) is out of scope for V1.0
>(and that we should resolve whether the protocol needs long job support
>for push in 1.0) I think there is a need for getting a job ID before
>any documents are submitted to allow status monitoring which
>transmission of data is going on. I an not convinced that checkpoint
>restart is needed for V1.0
CBM> I would be willing to change 8.17 to a normal push version, but is keen to
CBM> keep support for long jobs in some form.
>I do not think that 8.19 (referenced resources) is a requirement for
>V1.0
CBM> I agree
CBM> I would also like to support the suggestion from Bob to take ut the
chunking
CBM> parts from the scenarios, I have come to believe that this is a pure
protocol
CBM> issue.
End of comments (it is only 11.15 pm here)
Carl-Uno