IPP Version 0.92 -Reply

IPP Version 0.92 -Reply

Scott A. Isaacson Scott_Isaacson at novell.com
Tue Nov 19 17:14:12 EST 1996


Yes, I expect to have a coherent document by the end of the week.


If not, we do have a fallback to just the requirements doc, but we do
need to review that as well.  These short deadlines have FORCED us
(especially me) to focus more than 100% of my time on this which I think
is good.  If we miss this chance, we might just let it slide out too far.


Scott




>>> Carl-Uno Manros <cmanros at cp10.es.xerox.com> 11/19/96 12:15pm
>>>
At 11:34 PM 11/18/96 PST, you wrote:


>The section on IPP Operations Using HTTP and how to encode IPP
>Operations is brand new, it just got thrown in.  Roger did a good job of
>pulling it together, but it probably doesn't fit very well in the doc where it
>is and it hasn't been reviewe at all.
>
>Scott A. Isaacson


Scott,


do you expect that we can have a coherent version by the end of the
week to
send to the IETF? If not, I suggest that we limit ourselves to sending the
Requirements documents at this stage and wait with sending the major
document until after the IETF meeting in December.


Carl-Uno


Carl-Uno Manros
Xerox Corporation
701 S. Aviation Blvd.
M/S: ESAE-231
El Segundo, CA 90245, USA
E-mail: manros at cp10.es.xerox.com



More information about the Ipp mailing list
Our website uses cookies on your device to give you the best user experience. By using our website, you agree to the placement of these cookies. To learn more, read our privacy policy. Read Privacy Policy