Will do. Anyone getting heartburn by leaving “Canon” or would you prefer “independent”?
Joe
From: ids-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ids-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Lee Farrell
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 5:10 PM
To: 'Brian Smithson'; ids at pwg.org
Subject: RE: [IDS] minutes and action items from 4/22/10 teleconference
Hi Brian et al,
Regarding the following paragraph in the Minutes:
7. Review document status
NAP binding specification ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/wd/wd-ids-napsoh10-20100409.pdf: date was changed and title (and headers) was changed to new format. Needs one more change on page 2, and change Lee Farrell’s affiliation to blank. Minor changes don’t need another review. Accept changes and post.
I would suggest that there's no need to delete the "Canon" affiliation for my entry -- given that they were my employers during my contributions on this document. This is my personal preference at the moment.
However if this causes heartburn for anyone, then please replace "Canon" with "independent" -- rather than leaving it blank.
Cheers,
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: ids-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ids-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Brian Smithson
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:15 AM
To: ids at pwg.org
Subject: [IDS] minutes and action items from 4/22/10 teleconference
Minutes are here:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/minutes/IDS-call-minutes-20100422.pdf
Action items are here:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/ActionItems/IDS-action-items-20100422.xls
I don't think we covered it in the teleconference, but I assume that the
next teleconference will be on May 6 at the usual time.
--
Regards,
Brian Smithson
PM, Security Research
PMP, CSM, CISSP, CISA, ISO 27000 PA
Advanced Imaging and Network Technologies
Ricoh Americas Corporation
(408)346-4435
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
ids mailing list
ids at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ids
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ids/attachments/20100422/cb0f7c32/attachment-0001.html>