I think the document was considered basically ready for prime time. I made a few edits after the meeting, and it’s on the agenda for tomorrow’s meeting. I like the proposed title change. If no one has a problem with it, I’ll change the title.
Joe
From: ids-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ids-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of James Turner
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 3:55 PM
To: ids at pwg.org
Subject: [IDS] Current Hardcopy attribute "Rationale" document
Hi Guys,
I joined the call at the face-to-face meeting right at the end of the discussion of the current rationale document.
I'm assuming it's not "ready for prime time" yet. Is that the case?
If so, is there a date we have planned for completion of this doc?
Also, since I wasn't a part of the initial review of this, I'm not sure if this was discussed or not, but I think the document needs a different title.
How about "The Business Case for NAC and Hardcopy Devices"
I think the title needs to be shorter, and we need to target biz types, not technical folks. It's my opinion we don't need to include "attributes" in the title. We'll get to that later in the doc.
Does this sound reasonable?
Randy
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ids/attachments/20100421/cc741504/attachment-0001.html>