Randy
Did you see Pete's note called "[Cloud] How different is Cloud Print
from our currently defined Print Service" from Sun 8/26/2012 5:58 AM
Glen
________________________________
From: cloud-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:cloud-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Randy Turner
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 10:56 AM
To: cloud at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [Cloud] Minutes posted from today's concall
Exactly...that was my thinking as well.
When we move a print service from a "local" network to "The Cloud", it
really becomes a network transport and AAA problem, which seems a
separate realm from the PWG semantic model.
I would think there would be no impact on a "job ticket"
I think this may be the case that Bill W. mentioned in a previous
email....for a lack of another group to take up the job ticket work,
this work was relegated to the cloud group -- I think I remember
something about it, but from a schedule perspective, I'm assuming that
the two efforts (cloud and job ticket) are separate, and that it's
possible to advance one without the other.
Randy
On Sep 24, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
Randy,
On 2012-09-24, at 6:26 PM, Randy Turner <rturner at amalfisystems.com>
wrote:
...
Regarding your earlier email statement (above), I was under the
impression that there was nothing that needed to be "adapted". Meaning,
we would like a Cloud printer to behave pretty much the same way we
would any other print service (like on an internal enterprise network).
This was based on a discussion at the last face-to-face meeting ( I
believe ).
From the Client perspective, this remains to be the case. Client prints
to Cloud service and that service looks just like a printer.
However, the Cloud to Printer interface is different than we've
supported before, mainly because we want a firewall/router-friendly
interface and not something that needs to be "punched" through to allow
for communications.
__________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20120925/ff6a892c/attachment-0002.html>