NIST is a US agency and, as so, work products are not copyrighted (I
believe by law). In fact their top page on cloud computing has the
following statement.
"This material is public domain although attribution to NIST is
requested. It may be freely duplicated and translated."
So maybe we should ask a different question. Do we want to (very)
tightly align our definition with content from NIST? I vote yes because
it shows coherence/alignment/??? with existing or other organization.
Note that the NIST definition and the one I propose are very high level
and interpretation for "Imaging" is what is are address.
Glen
p.s. If I can find the contact information I will send a note.
gwp
________________________________
From: Petrie, Glen
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:45 PM
To: Petrie, Glen; Michael Sweet
Cc: cloud at pwg.org
Subject: RE: [Cloud] Fwd: NIST cloud defs
Sorry Mike, I skipped over the part where you like the substance. So
I will send a note NIST folks.
________________________________
From: cloud-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:cloud-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Petrie, Glen
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:41 PM
To: Michael Sweet
Cc: cloud at pwg.org
Subject: RE: [Cloud] Fwd: NIST cloud defs
Your right about the "copying" but that can be addressed at a later
date. For the moment; is this the type of definition that was intended?
If not, can you or others suggest a couple to sentence on a definition?
I understand your point on 'Imaging' versus 'Printing/Printer'; but can
we put together a Print/Printing first at then see how to scope it for
Imaging?
Glen
________________________________
From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet at apple.com]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:15 PM
To: Petrie, Glen
Cc: cloud at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [Cloud] Fwd: NIST cloud defs
Glen,
While I like the substance of the definition, I am uneasy about copying
their words like this - it would be good to contact the authors to get
their written permission so that we credit them appropriately in the
cloud model spec.
Also, since we *are* doing Cloud Imaging, we probably want the
definition to use Cloud Imaging instead of Cloud Printing and Imaging
Device instead of Printer.
Thanks!
On Apr 15, 2011, at 8:44 AM, Petrie, Glen wrote:
Based on the article referenced below I modified in an attempt to create
a definition for cloud printing. I thought it could be reviewed to see
if could be useful definition. In most cases, I literal changed
"computing" to "printing" (or printer). I also added a few print
related items.
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/white/CloudPrintingDef_V01_-_A_Suggestio
n.doc
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/white/CloudPrintingDef_V01_-_A_Suggestio
n.pdf
glen
________________________________
From: cloud-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:cloud-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Ira McDonald
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:47 AM
To: cloud at pwg.org; Ira McDonald
Subject: [Cloud] Fwd: NIST cloud defs
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Brian Smithson <bsmithson at ricohsv.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:26 PM
Subject: NIST cloud defs
To: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic at gmail.com>
To share at the meeting, if it's useful:
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SNS/cloud-computing/cloud-def-v15.doc
--
Regards,
Brian Smithson
PMP, CSM, CISSP, CISA, ISO 27000 PA
Security Research, Planning
Advanced Customer Technologies
Ricoh Americas Corporation
bsmithson at ricohsv.com
(408)346-4435 <tel:%28408%29346-4435>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
__________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/cloud/attachments/20110415/9ea793ae/attachment-0001.html>