attachment
<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Although I was thinking of using roles in a general sense as the actors in Use Cases, using a set of defined roles might be better. I seem to recall an effort, sometime in the past, to generate a full set of roles associated with imaging services. I don’t recall if this was part of some specification or a separate effort, or indeed how complete the set was. A stroll though the memory lane of the FTP site was amusing but unsuccessful. Anyone have a notion of where/when/what about that role defining effort?</p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks, </p><p class=MsoNormal>Bill Wagner<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>