attachment-0001
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7638.1">
<TITLE>RE: [Pwg-Announce] Call for Review of langPDF/PS/PCL variants for IANAPrinter MIB (30 April 2010)</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> I think we are stuck treating these as languages/language families.<BR>
<BR>
I'd like to suggest change the description for langPCL3, langPCL3GUI, langPCL5e, langPCL5c. Rename "HP Printer Command Language xxx" to "Printer Command Language xxx"<BR>
<BR>
George<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Michael Sweet [<A HREF="mailto:msweet@apple.com">mailto:msweet@apple.com</A>]<BR>
Sent: Mon 5/3/2010 11:15 AM<BR>
To: George Liu<BR>
Cc: Ira McDonald; pwg-announce@pwg.org<BR>
Subject: Re: [Pwg-Announce] Call for Review of langPDF/PS/PCL variants for IANAPrinter MIB (30 April 2010)<BR>
<BR>
On May 3, 2010, at 11:10 AM, George Liu wrote:<BR>
> Has PCL-XL been left out intentionally?<BR>
<BR>
Yes, because it is already registered in RFC 3805:<BR>
<BR>
langPCLXL(47), -- Not in RFC 1759<BR>
-- Printer Control Language. Extended<BR>
-- language features for printing, and<BR>
-- printer control.<BR>
-- Tammy Ferguson (HP)<BR>
-- and Binnur Al-Kazily (HP)<BR>
-- Technical reference manual: None<BR>
-- Hewlett-Packard Co.<BR>
<BR>
><BR>
> There're PCL-XL 1.1, 2.0, 3.0, etc. Microsoft GPD based mini drivers is<BR>
> able to generate PCL-XL.<BR>
><BR>
> George<BR>
><BR>
> -----Original Message-----<BR>
> From: Ira McDonald [<A HREF="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com">mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com</A>]<BR>
> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:47 AM<BR>
> To: George Liu; Ira McDonald<BR>
> Cc: pwg-announce@pwg.org; Michael R Sweet<BR>
> Subject: Re: [Pwg-Announce] Call for Review of langPDF/PS/PCL variants<BR>
> for IANAPrinter MIB (30 April 2010)<BR>
><BR>
> Hi George,<BR>
><BR>
> Right - we're only talking about the graphics drawing aspect<BR>
> of these printer languages.<BR>
><BR>
> The IEEE 1284 Device ID format only supports a list of<BR>
> printer languages - it cannot be extended (interoperably)<BR>
> for these other device-specific aspects.<BR>
><BR>
> The PWG cannot actually extend the capabilities keywords<BR>
> or their syntax in the base IEEE 1284 spec.<BR>
><BR>
> So the scope of comments we're requesting is only to identify<BR>
> any other common variants of PCL (for example) that should<BR>
> be registered with IANA.<BR>
><BR>
> All of these are enumerated values in the single Printer MIB<BR>
> integer object prtInterpreterLangFamily. Other objects such<BR>
> as prtInterpreterLangLevel and prtInterpreterDescription can<BR>
> be used by vendors to distinguish vendor-unique features.<BR>
><BR>
> Cheers,<BR>
> - Ira<BR>
><BR>
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)<BR>
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG<BR>
> Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG<BR>
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB<BR>
> Blue Roof Music/High North Inc<BR>
> <A HREF="http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic">http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic</A><BR>
> <A HREF="http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc">http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc</A><BR>
> <A HREF="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com">mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com</A><BR>
> winter:<BR>
> 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176<BR>
> 734-944-0094<BR>
> summer:<BR>
> PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839<BR>
> 906-494-2434<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:50 PM, George Liu <george.liu@ricoh-tech.com><BR>
> wrote:<BR>
>> Unlike PDF, which is a document format, Postscript and PCL/PCL-XL are<BR>
> PDL, which means printer-device specific.<BR>
>><BR>
>> A Tray-1 PCL command for HP printer means Bypass Tray, but means the<BR>
> first tray under the printer engine for Ricoh printer.<BR>
>> Also, in Postscript, there are many vendor specific Postscript<BR>
> setpagedevice commands.<BR>
>><BR>
>> How will the new command set definition handles this case?<BR>
>><BR>
>> Are we only taking about the graphics drawing part not the device<BR>
> control part?<BR>
>> Or are we making "langPCL5e" only for a specific vender?<BR>
>><BR>
>> George<BR>
>><BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
________________________________________________________________________<BR>
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
<br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.
</BODY>
</HTML>