attachment-0002
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi Pete,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">See my comments below -</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">1) In Section 5 Print Service Description,
the section reference for "the definition for the PrintServiceCapabilities
container element" is incorrect.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">See the following text in the spec:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">"</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">368 A </font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">container
element</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> is needed to carry the subset
of PrintServiceDescription elements, </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">369 the PrintJobTicketCapabilities and
the PrintDocumentCapabilities in a protocol. </font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">Section
0</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">370 contains the definition for the
PrintServiceCapabilities container element.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">"</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">2) the "container element"
mentioned above is not defined in the spec.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">3) Table 3 - the element "</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">PWGRasterDocumentBackside</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">"
came from PWG Raster Format spec, in Section 5 Semantic Model Elements
- Table 9: the "</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">PWGRasterDocumentSheetBack</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">"
element. Shouldn't this element use the same name in these two specs????</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">-Nancy</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Nancy Chen, PWG Vice-Chair<br>
Principal Engineer<br>
Solutions and Technology<br>
Oki Data<br>
2000 Bishops Gate Blvd.<br>
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054<br>
Phone: (856)222-7006</font><br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.