attachment-0001
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi Pete,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I'd like to keep AvailableResources.
It's important to keep an inventory of installed system resources
and all information about them so that they can be easily tracked for product
installation as well as updated/upgraded later.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">-Nancy</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com></b>
</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">09/14/2011 02:06 PM</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler@xerox.com>,
Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Nancy.Chen@okidata.com, mfd@pwg.org</font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: [MFD] RE: Missing semantic text
for elements specific to System Object in System Control Service spec</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Hi Pete,<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>I would prefer to keep the top-level AvailableResources
element.<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>Otherwise, an MFD can only implement Resources if
it publishes a<br>
Resource service. And the System Control Service can't modify<br>
metadata (such as expiration dates) on Resources or query them.<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>That means no CIM or other translation of PWG SM can
expose<br>
the Resource instances.<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>Cheers,<br>
- Ira<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)<br>
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG<br>
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG<br>
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SWG<br>
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB<br>
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc<br>
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic<br>
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc<br>
mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com<br>
Christmas through April:</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176<br>
734-944-0094</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>May to Christmas:<br>
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839<br>
906-494-2434</font></tt>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Zehler, Peter <Peter.Zehler@xerox.com>wrote:<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>> Nancy,****<br>
><br>
> Responses are inline below.****<br>
><br>
> Pete****<br>
><br>
> ** **<br>
><br>
> ** **<br>
><br>
> Peter Zehler<br>
><br>
> Xerox Research Center Webster<br>
> Email: Peter.Zehler@Xerox.com<br>
> Voice: (585) 265-8755<br>
> FAX: (585) 265-7441<br>
> US Mail: Peter Zehler<br>
> Xerox Corp.<br>
> 800 Phillips Rd.<br>
> M/S 128-25E<br>
> Webster NY, 14580-9701 ****<br>
><br>
> ** **<br>
><br>
> *From:* Nancy.Chen@okidata.com [mailto:Nancy.Chen@okidata.com]<br>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 06, 2011 12:40 PM<br>
> *To:* Zehler, Peter<br>
> *Cc:* mfd@pwg.org<br>
> *Subject:* Missing semantic text for elements specific to System Object
in<br>
> System Control Service spec****<br>
><br>
> ** **<br>
><br>
><br>
> Hi Pete,<br>
><br>
> In the System Control Service spec, the following elements are specific
to<br>
> the System Object, hence are not defined in MFD Model spec. Would
you<br>
> please add their semantic text ?<br>
><br>
> in Section 6.2, the text for the following elements are missing in<br>
> SystemDescription: ****<br>
><br>
><br>
> AvailableResources<br>
> <PZ>Removed from model. It was added for the stalled<br>
> ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_RES/draft-ietf-ipp-get-resource-00.pdfspecification</PZ><br>
> ****<br>
><br>
> DevicesSupported ****<br>
><br>
> <PZ>Removed due to no clean mapping to PWG5104.2 and lack of
PSI support or<br>
> PSI implementations.</PZ><br>
> ServicesSupported ****<br>
><br>
> <PZ>Added</PZ>****<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> in Section 6.3, the text for the following elements are missing in<br>
> SystemStatus:<br>
><br>
> ConfiguredServices<br>
><br>
> <PZ>Added</PZ><br>
> SystemConfigChangeNumber<br>
> <PZ>Added</PZ><br>
> SystemHealth<br>
> <PZ>Removed until PWG Hardcopy Device Health Assessment Attributes<br>
> completes Formal Vote</PZ><br>
> SystemTotals ****<br>
><br>
> <PZ>Added</PZ>****<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Some of them are already defined in another PWG standard spec, but
since<br>
> there is no reference in MFD Model spec, I think it's a good idea
to add<br>
> them here.<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> -Nancy<br>
><br>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> Nancy Chen, PWG Vice-Chair<br>
> Principal Engineer<br>
> Solutions and Technology<br>
> Oki Data<br>
> 2000 Bishops Gate Blvd.<br>
> Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054<br>
> Phone: (856)222-7006****<br>
><br>
> ** **<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> This message has been scanned for viruses and<br>
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>,
and is<br>
> believed to be clean.<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> mfd mailing list<br>
> mfd@pwg.org<br>
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/mfd<br>
><br>
></font></tt>
<br>
<br><br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.