attachment-0001
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Global: The header text of each page
has a much larger font than the footer!</font>
<br>
<ol>
<li value=1><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Lines 194-195:</font></ol><font size=2 face="sans-serif">FaxOut
are used repeatedly as an English verb, or as a function name, etc. Reads
funny. Notice that FaxOut is a special term defined in MFD Semantics as
the name of the specific MFD service.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">2. Section 5 - MFD Model
Overview</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Do we need a MFD Model Overview for
an individual service spec? Why not move the content of this section
to the beginning of Section 6, I like it as a concise prelude before
the FaxOut Service Model Overview?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">3. Line 282: extra "that".</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">4. Figure 13 FaxOutJobProcessing
Schema diagram is out of date?</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The "DestinationURIs" is "DestinationUris"
in MFD Model and Common Semantics spec and XML Schema. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">5. Section 7.3.3.1, Line
495 -</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">DestinationURI is fully described in
5.2.3.1 of MFD Model and common Semantics. Is this section different than
that? Why not just reference it instead of providing only part of description?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">6. Extension Points in
Schema: I remember that in one of the face-to-face meeting we decided that
any complex element type will include an attribute extension point and
an element extension point. Many of the datatypes in FaxOut Service
model have one of the extension point missing. Shouldn't these be
all consistent? However, if the existing MFD Schema is mostly not
consistent this way, it might require a lot of changes throughout.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">7. GetActiveFaxOutJobs
has the list of JobSummaries as a mandatary response element returned,
that is optional in the MFD Model. Is this a FAxOutService-specific
requirement?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">9. RestartFaxoutService has some
service-specific request paramenters? Some are not listed in the MFD Model
spec. Also in the last face-to-face, I thought we have a consensus that
a service can not restart itself, must be restarted by the SystemControlService.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">-Nancy<br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Nancy Chen, PWG Vice-Chair<br>
Principal Engineer<br>
Solutions and Technology<br>
Oki Data<br>
2000 Bishops Gate Blvd.<br>
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054<br>
Phone: (856)222-7006</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.