attachment
<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi Mike,</div><div><br></div><div>Media size dimensions seems at first glance to be more intuitive?, but I think I prefer PWG media size name</div><div>as the way users are more likely to search.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>- Ira</div><div><br></div><div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><i><font size="1">Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)</font></i></div><div><i><font size="1">Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF<br></font></i></div><div dir="ltr"><i><font size="1">Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG</font></i></div><div><i><font size="1">Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG<br></font></i></div><div dir="ltr"><i><font size="1">Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG<br>Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group<br>Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG<br>IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB<br>Blue Roof Music / High North Inc<br><a style="color:rgb(51,51,255)" href="http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic</a><br><a style="color:rgb(102,0,204)" href="http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc</a><br>mailto: <a href="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com" target="_blank">blueroofmusic@gmail.com</a><br>(permanent) PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434</font></i></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 2:51 PM Michael Sweet via ipp <<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org">ipp@pwg.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">All,<br>
<br>
This question came up during our review of the MSN 2.1 at the face-to-face meeting. Basically, the current media size tables have inconsistent ordering. The original specification (MSN 1.0) sorted the sizes by width and then length. The 2.0 version added tables that are sorted by the media size name.<br>
<br>
What ordering do people prefer for media sizes? Sort by the PWG media size name ("na_letter_8.5x11in" comes after "na_legal_8.5x14in") or by dimensions ("na_letter_8.5x11in" comes *before* "na_legal_8.5x14in")?<br>
<br>
Please let me know your preference by June 15, 2023 so I can put out a new draft of the MSN specification.<br>
<br>
________________________<br>
Michael Sweet<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ipp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" target="_blank">ipp@pwg.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><br>
</blockquote></div>