attachment
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Mike,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">(CC'ing the IPP Workgroup reflector back in...)<div class="">
<div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jul 28, 2021, at 3:01 PM, Michael Sweet <<a href="mailto:msweet@msweet.org" class="">msweet@msweet.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class="">
<div class="">
Smith,<br class="">
<br class="">
> On Jul 28, 2021, at 4:53 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <<a href="mailto:smith.kennedy@hp.com" class="">smith.kennedy@hp.com</a>> wrote:<br class="">
> <br class="">
> Hi Mike,<br class="">
> <br class="">
> Starting work on the next draft of Finishings 3.0. In the minutes it says:<br class="">
> <br class="">
> ⁃ Section 5.1.2:<br class="">
> ⁃ Add reference to 5100.2, should use "output-bin" to specify a 'stacker' value to get this behavior<br class="">
> <br class="">
> What does this mean? Does this pertain to the 'jog-offset' keyword?<br class="">
<br class="">
Yes. The 'jog-offset' value should be deprecated, with a note to say that the 'stacker' values for "output-bin" should be used instead.<br class=""></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>I remember us deciding on that. Here's what I have so far:</div><div><br class=""></div><div>•<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>‘jog-offset’ (14): (DEPRECATED) Shift each Set from the previous one by a small amount which is device dependent. This value has no effect on the “job-sheet”. This value SHOULD NOT have an effect if each Set of the Job consists of one sheet. The "output-bin" Job Template attribute should be used instead, specifying one of the 'stacker-NN' keywords (e.g. 'stacker-1').</div><div><br class=""></div><div>But I wonder about the lack of a keyword like 'jog-offset-1' that more specifically identifies an output tray that is capable of jogging? I've not looked at that in a long time.</div><div><br class=""></div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
> <br class="">
> Smith<br class="">
> <br class="">
> /**<br class="">
> Smith Kennedy<br class="">
> HP Inc.<br class="">
> */<br class="">
> <br class="">
>> On May 20, 2021, at 2:30 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" class="">ipp@pwg.org</a>> wrote:<br class="">
>> <br class="">
>> Signed PGP part<br class="">
>> All,<br class="">
>> <br class="">
>> I have posted the minutes from today's IPP workgroup conference call to:<br class="">
>> <br class="">
>> <a href="https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20210520.pdf" class="">
https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20210520.pdf</a><br class="">
>> <br class="">
>> Our next conference call is on June 3, 2021 at 3pm ET.<br class="">
>> <br class="">
>> ________________________<br class="">
>> Michael Sweet<br class="">
>> <br class="">
>> <br class="">
>> <br class="">
>> <br class="">
>> <br class="">
> <br class="">
<br class="">
________________________<br class="">
Michael Sweet<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
</div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>