attachment
<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi Smith,</div><div><br></div><div>I see your point about unique labels, but are you suggesting that we</div><div>should define finer-grained standard "print-quality" values? (I suggest</div><div>that there lies madness.)</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>- Ira</div><div><br></div><div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)<br>Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG</div><div>Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG<br></div><div dir="ltr">Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG<br>Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group<br>Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG<br>IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB<br>Blue Roof Music / High North Inc<br><a style="color:rgb(51,51,255)" href="http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic</a><br><a style="color:rgb(102,0,204)" href="http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc</a><br>mailto: <a href="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com" target="_blank">blueroofmusic@gmail.com</a><br>PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434<br><br><div style="display:inline"></div><div style="display:inline"></div><div style="display:inline"></div><div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 4:04 PM Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) via ipp <<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org">ipp@pwg.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;">Hi Mike,<div><br></div><div>The only problem I see is that vendor- or site-defined print quality values, printer vendors likely want labels that can at least uniquely identify the additional settings, and that could have corresponding _tooltip and _helpurl content.</div><div><br></div><div><div>
Smith<br><br>/**<br> Smith Kennedy<br> HP Inc.<br>*/
</div>
<div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Aug 28, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" target="_blank">ipp@pwg.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="gmail-m_-5107905546739437448Apple-interchange-newline"><div>
<div>All,<br>
<br>
As an alternative to adding more (out of order) enum values to print-quality, how about a print-quality-percent (integer(0:100)) attribute where:<br>
<br>
- print-quality-percent='25' maps to print-quality='3' (draft),<br>
- print-quality-percent='50' maps to print-quality='4' (normal), and<br>
- print-quality-percent='75' maps to print-quality='5' (high5)<br>
<br>
Thoughts?<br>
<br>
________________________<br>
Michael Sweet<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ipp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" target="_blank">ipp@pwg.org</a><br>
<a href="https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/IvxiC2kr5rfp2N1mkU1hC1u?domain=pwg.org" target="_blank">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><br>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
ipp mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" target="_blank">ipp@pwg.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><br>
</blockquote></div>