attachment
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Smith,<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jul. 17, 2018, at 2:34 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect) <<a href="mailto:smith.kennedy@hp.com" class="">smith.kennedy@hp.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class="">Hi Mike and Rick,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">HP Inc. has no objections to Mike's suggested size names.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">I have also seen 55x85mm shown as a standard size of business cards in Europe, although that is within 1mm of the credit card size.<br class=""></blockquote></blockquote><br class=""></div><div class="">Are you referring to "om_card_54x86mm"?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>Yes.</div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div class=""><div class="">
<div dir="auto" style="letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Smith<br class=""><br class="">/**<br class=""> Smith Kennedy<br class=""> Wireless & Standards Architect - IPG-PPS<br class=""> Standards - IEEE ISTO PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum / USB-IF<br class=""> Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group<br class=""> HP Inc.<br class="">*/<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div></div>
</div>
<div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jun 20, 2018, at 4:20 PM, Yardumian, Rick <<a href="mailto:RYardumian@ciis.canon.com" class="">RYardumian@ciis.canon.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Hi Mike,<br class=""><br class="">I'm fine with your suggestions. Does anyone else in the PWG have a preference for these media sizes?<br class=""><br class="">Thanks,<br class="">Rick<br class=""><br class="">-----Original Message-----<br class="">From: <a href="mailto:msweet@apple.com" class="">msweet@apple.com</a> [<a href="mailto:msweet@apple.com" class="">mailto:msweet@apple.com</a>] <br class="">Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 6:25 AM<br class="">To: Yardumian, Rick<br class="">Cc: <a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" class="">ipp@pwg.org</a><br class="">Subject: Re: [IPP] Canon requests registration of four new IPP media sizes<br class=""><br class="">After looking at the existing photo entries, maybe the following would be more consistent:<br class=""><br class=""> oe_square-photo_4x4in<br class=""> oe_square-photo_5x5in<br class=""> om_square-photo_89x89mm<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Jun 20, 2018, at 8:48 AM, Michael Sweet <<a href="mailto:msweet@apple.com" class="">msweet@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">Rick,<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On Jun 18, 2018, at 7:06 PM, Yardumian, Rick <<a href="mailto:RYardumian@ciis.canon.com" class="">RYardumian@ciis.canon.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">Hi,<br class=""><br class="">Canon requests that the following four new media sizes be registered.<br class="">- om_square_5x5in<br class="">- oe_square-4x4_4x4in<br class="">- om_square89mm_89x89mm<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Given these are photo sizes, how about:<br class=""><br class=""> oe_photo-square_4x4in<br class=""> oe_photo-square_5x5in<br class=""> om_photo-square_89x89mm<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">- om_cardsize_55x91mm<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">Given this is for business cards, I would suggest:<br class=""><br class=""> om_business-card_55x91mm<br class=""><br class="">I have also seen 55x85mm shown as a standard size of business cards in Europe, although that is within 1mm of the credit card size. In North America we use 2x3.5in... *If* we added those for completeness we'd have:<br class=""><br class=""> oe_business-card_2x3.5in (North America)<br class=""> om_business-card_55x85mm (Europe)<br class=""> om_business-card_55x91mm (Japan)<br class=""><br class="">Thoughts?<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">I have checked the IANA IPP registered media sizes and could not find any size matches so as far as I can tell, these are new media sizes.<br class=""><br class="">The first three “square” sizes are used for photographic printing. The fourth “cardsize” media is used for business cards. Canon understands that the above media names may need to be changed for consistency. All feedback is welcome.<br class=""><br class="">Thank you,<br class="">Rick Yardumian<br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">ipp mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" class="">ipp@pwg.org</a><br class=""><a href="https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp" class="">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><br class=""></blockquote><br class="">_________________________________________________________<br class="">Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer<br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">ipp mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" class="">ipp@pwg.org</a><br class=""><a href="https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp" class="">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><br class=""></blockquote><br class="">_________________________________________________________<br class="">Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer<br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">ipp mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:ipp@pwg.org" class="">ipp@pwg.org</a><br class=""><a href="https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp" class="">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp</a><br class=""></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>