attachment
<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>Hi Mike,<br><br></div>Although I agree that the answer is conceptually yes, it's yucky from the<br></div>point of view of attributes like "operations-supported".<br>
<br></div>Which is why I suggest we rule it out and say that an SCS has an endpoint<br></div>in an IPP System new first-class object (available ONLY to an Operator or<br></div>Administrator and never to an End User). That actually matches the SM<br>
definition of SCS much more faithfully and simplifies counter and diagnostic<br></div>attributes.<br><br></div>Cheers,<br></div>- Ira<br><br><div><div><div><br><br></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div><div dir="ltr">Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)<br>Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG<br>Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG<br>Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group<br>Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG<br>
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB<br>Blue Roof Music / High North Inc<br><a style="color:rgb(51,51,255)" href="http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic</a><br>
<a style="color:rgb(102,0,204)" href="http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc</a><br>mailto: <a href="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com" target="_blank">blueroofmusic@gmail.com</a><br>
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094<br>Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434<br><br><div style="display:inline"></div><div style="display:inline"></div><div style="display:inline"></div>
<div></div><div></div><div></div><div></div></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Michael Sweet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:msweet@apple.com" target="_blank">msweet@apple.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">Ira,<div><br><div><div>On Jan 14, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Ira McDonald <<a href="mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com" target="_blank">blueroofmusic@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><font color="#000000">...</font>
</div><div class="im">So, a question. Can an implementation of SCS (at some "ipp/ipps"<br></div></div><div class="im">URI endpoint) also accept Print commands at the same endpoint?<br></div></div><div class="im">
I suggest yes, but could be argued out of this. It partly has to do with<br>
</div></div><div class="im">finding roll-up usage counters for all service instances from the SCS<br></div></div><div class="im">somewhere on an IPP system.<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>
Conceptually yes, although we would need to very carefully define this since ordinary users normally do not have access to the System Control Service, and you would need to define (or be able to define) the subordinate service that would receive the print jobs - this is especially important for systems with multiple marking engines (generally anything like CUPS).</div>
<div class="im"><div><br></div><div>
<span style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;border-collapse:separate;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;font-family:'Andale Mono';word-spacing:0px"><span style="text-indent:0px;letter-spacing:normal;font-variant:normal;text-align:-webkit-auto;font-style:normal;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal;border-collapse:separate;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;font-family:'Andale Mono';word-spacing:0px"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">
_________________________________________________________<br>Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair</div></span></span>
</div>
<br></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>