attachment
<html>
<head>
<meta name="generator" content="Windows Mail 17.5.9600.20689">
<style><!--
.EmailQuote {
margin-left:1pt;
padding-left:4pt;
border-left:#800000 2px solid;
}
--></style><style data-externalstyle="true"><!--
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph {
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
}
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst,
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle,
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast {
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
line-height:115%;
}
--></style></head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div data-externalstyle="false" dir="ltr" style="font-family: 'Calibri', 'Segoe UI', 'Meiryo', 'Microsoft YaHei UI', 'Microsoft JhengHei UI', 'Malgun Gothic', 'sans-serif';font-size:12pt;">
<div>Greetings: It appears that the IPP INFRA spec has met PWG Last Call quorum requirements. After resolution of comments, this would allow that spec to go to PWG vote. However, since INFRA and CLOUD are mutually dependent, one cannot be approved separately from the other. The CLOUD spec is far short of satisfying PWG Last Call quorum requirements. I urge members, particularly those who have responded to the IPP INFRA Last Call, to take a look at the CLOUD spec and respond to the Cloud Model Last Call as indicated below.</div><div>Thanks, Bill Wagner<br></div><div data-signatureblock="true"><br></div><div style="padding-top: 5px; border-top-color: rgb(229, 229, 229); border-top-width: 1px; border-top-style: solid;"><div><font face=" 'Calibri', 'Segoe UI', 'Meiryo', 'Microsoft YaHei UI', 'Microsoft JhengHei UI', 'Malgun Gothic', 'sans-serif'" style='line-height: 15pt; letter-spacing: 0.02em; font-family: "Calibri", "Segoe UI", "Meiryo", "Microsoft YaHei UI", "Microsoft JhengHei UI", "Malgun Gothic", "sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;'><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:wamwagner@comcast.net" target="_parent">William Wagner</a><br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:01 AM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:pwg-announce@pwg.org" target="_parent">pwg-announce@pwg.org</a></font></div></div><div><br></div><div dir="ltr">
<div>The PWG Last Call of the Cloud Imaging
Requirements and Model (CLOUDIMAGING) </div><div>specification located at: <br>
<a href="http://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/wd/wd-cloudimagingmodel10-20150122.pdf" target="_parent"><u><font color="#0066cc">http://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/wd/wd-cloudimagingmodel10-20150122.pdf</font></u></a></div><div>is extended to 8 March to allow for sufficient acknowledgements to meet the PWG</div><div>Process quorum requirement.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Apple has provided notice that it has prototyped the required attributes and<br>
values defined in the IPP Shared Infrastructure Extensions document, which<br>
is an IPP Binding of this Cloud Imaging Requirements and Model<br>
specification; the prototype of a model binding satisfies the prototype<br>
requirement for the specification of a general model. The Cloud WG has<br>
completed extensive review of the various revisions of this model document<br>
and a workgroup last call. </div><div>Note that because the Cloud Imaging
Requirements and Model and the <strong>
</strong> IPP</div><div>Shared Infrastructure Extensions specifications are mutually dependent, they </div><div>must both be approved in voting before either becomes a PWG Candidate Standard. </div><div>And specifications must meet PWG Last Call quorum before they can be put to vote.<br>
</div><div><br></div><div>The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG members must<br>
acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any document<br>
can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote<br>
but it DOES require your review acknowledgment.<br>
<br>
HOW TO RESPOND<br>
Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format:<br>
Subject: <Company Name> has reviewed the Cloud Imaging Requirements and<br>
Model specification and has [no] comments<br>
<br>
WHERE TO SEND YOUR RESPONSE<br>
Please send your response to *all* of the following email addresses<br>
(replacing "dot" with '.' and "at" with <a href="mailto:'@'" target="_parent">'@'</a>):<br>
cloud "at" pwg "dot" org (Cloud WG mailing list - you must be subscribed!);<br>
rnevo "at" sea "dot" Samsung "dot" com; (Ron Nevo, Cloud WG Chair);<br>
wamwagner "at" comcast "dot" net (Bill Wagner, Cloud Vice chair); msweet<br>
"at" apple "dot" com (Michael Sweet, Cloud Secretary)<br>
<br>
Note that you must be subscribed to the Cloud WG mailing list to send email<br>
to that list - otherwise your email will be silently discarded. You can<br>
subscribe to this list at <a href="https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud" target="_parent">https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud</a>.<br>
<br>
Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list.<br>
<br>
Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 is<br>
located at:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf" target="_parent">http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf</a><br>
<br>
_________________________________________________________<br>
William A Wagner, Cloud Vice Chair<br>
<br>
<br></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>