Return to List
Login to Post Comment
Closed as rejected.
I was just wondering about this since I'm reviewing Sharad's pwg5100.5.test and it doesn't check to see if "ipp-features-supported" exists and contains 'document-object'. But that would cause a normative change to 5100.5, so I'll walk away from this.
5100.13 defines ipp-features-supported, so that is the correct place to leave the initial definition of "document-object" (since 5100.5 came before 5100.13...)
The 'document-object' keyword for "ipp-features-supported" is still in 5100.13. We have 5100.13 open for revision, so a minor update to 5100.5 to take this in and remove it from 5100.13 might clean this up a bit.