IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Errata in RFC 2911: "Interne

RE: IPP> Errata in RFC 2911: "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Mod el and Semantics"

From: Hastings, Tom N (hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 21:25:55 EDT

  • Next message: Mike Sweet: "Re: IPP> Last Call comment to remove redirect URL and status code from IPP GET"

    In case you weren't aware, there is an RFC Errata procedure. See
    http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html
    which you can get to from the RFC Editor's Home Page at:
    http://www.rfc-editor.org

    Scanning a number of the errata seems to show the same kinds of errata about
    allocation of ranges of codes as the errata we have in RFC 2911.

    This is the first errata for RFC 2911.

    Tom

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Hastings, Tom N [mailto:hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 17:52
    To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
    Cc: ipp@pwg.org
    Subject: IPP> Errata in RFC 2911: "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model
    and Se mantics"

    This note points out two errata in RFC 2911 regarding the ranges of status
    codes.

    Section 13, which is "APPENDIX B: Status Codes and Suggested Status Code
    Messages" has:

          "redirection" - 0x0200 to 0x02FF

    which should be:

          "redirection" - 0x0300 to 0x03FF

    and has:

       The top half (128 values) of each range (0x0n40 to 0x0nFF, for n = 0
       to 5) is reserved for vendor use within each status code class.

    which should be:

       The top half (128 values) of each range (0x0n80 to 0x0nFF, for n = 0
       to 5) is reserved for vendor use within each status code class.

    Thank you,

    Tom Hastings
    IPP WG Editor

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 17 2002 - 21:26:36 EDT