attachment
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7651.11">
<TITLE>CIM Core discussion on PrintOutputTray CR *still* pending.</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Both of the commenters were in an all-day meeting today, did not make the call, so we could not discuss whether our changes adequately respond to their comments. It's on the agenda again for Tuesday. And I will communicate directly with the two people before then. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Also, I posted a new version of the CR with corrected formatting in </FONT><A HREF="ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/cim/"><U><FONT COLOR="#0000FF" SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/cim/</FONT></U></A><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">. Turns out that the problem with the table at the end was that the cut-and-paste of the comments from IBM resulted in the editor thinking that the formatting was fixed and it was not allowed to word-wrap the comments. Hence the wwwwiiiiddddeeee column in the table. Won't happen again. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Also, with the several delays, we missed the schema v2.15 bus, which left today. Had we been able to discuss the comments either Tuesday or today, we would have made it. Rats. The 2.16 bus is three months later, so we will have a whole bunch of CRs in that version. . </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">rick</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">----------------------</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Richard_Landau(at)dell(dot)com, Stds & System Mgt Architecture, CTO Office</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">+1-512-728-9023, One Dell Way, RR5-3, MS RR5-09, Round Rock, TX 78682</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>