attachment
<br><font size=3 face="sans-serif">The PWG has been working to satisfy
our agreement as outlined in the Work Register. Since June, the PWG has
formed a working team, educated ourselves on CIM, discussed alternatives
and identified approaches to updating the current CIM model for printer
management. Progress on the Work Register is currently stalled, however.
Our one audience with CIM Core, via teleconference, left us with questions
about the DMTF Change Request process, possible frowning upon deprecation,
whether or not a Print Profile is desired and how to actually go about
writing and submitting the formal DMTF Change Request. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=3 face="sans-serif">We think we have a viable approach to
recommend for updating CIM with a mixture of editorial changes and some
additional properties that will accomplish our main goal of modernization
in the least disruptive manner. We can envision possible follow-on work
with deeper, more meaningful revamping including a complete Imaging Services
model. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=3 face="sans-serif">In order to move forward we need a more
active working relationship with person(s) in the DMTF who can guide us
through the process hurdles including someone willing to review our alternatives
and recommendations before we can set off with confidence on what we know
will result in a fruitful course of action. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=3 face="sans-serif">John, I know you are willing to assist,
as you have in the past. I request that you please help identify the right
parties. Then we can schedule a (hopefully) brief period of interaction
aimed at getting the PWG Work Register back on track with minimal delay.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">----------------------------------------------
<br>
Harry Lewis <br>
IBM STSM<br>
Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group<br>
http://www.pwg.org<br>
IBM Printing Systems <br>
http://www.ibm.com/printers<br>
303-924-5337<br>
---------------------------------------------- </font>