attachment-0001
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4926.2500" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face="Courier New" color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=377514022-15082003>Hi Harry,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Courier New" color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=377514022-15082003></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Courier New" color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=377514022-15082003>HP does believe strongly in the WSMF as a basis for
standards for the management of web services. We do expect management of
printers, MFPs and print services to move in this direction over
time.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Courier New" color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=377514022-15082003></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Courier New" color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=377514022-15082003>bt</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face="Courier New" color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=377514022-15082003>
<P><FONT size=2>---------------------------------------------------<BR>Bob
Taylor <BR>Senior
Architect <BR>IPG
Strategic Technology Development <BR>Hewlett-Packard
Co. <BR><A
href="mailto:bobt@hp.com">mailto:bobt@hp.com</A> <BR>phone:
360.212.2625/T212.2625 <BR>fax:
208.730-5111 <BR>---------------------------------------------------
</FONT></P></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Harry Lewis
[mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:48
AM<BR><B>To:</B> TAYLOR,BOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1);
wbmm@pwg.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> WSMF vs WBMM<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2>Bob, regarding HP's recent submission to Oasis - Web
Services Management Framework - do you see this as a preferred path to web
services based printer, mfp and print services management than PWG WBMM? If
so, do you have any recommendations as to how we can prevent several
organizations reinventing similar solutions and semantics and what the optimal
PWG contribution might be? </FONT><BR><FONT face=sans-serif
size=2>---------------------------------------------- <BR>Harry Lewis
<BR>Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group<BR>http://www.pwg.org<BR>IBM
Printing Systems
<BR>http://www.ibm.com/printers<BR>303-924-5337<BR>----------------------------------------------
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>