attachment
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2722.900" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=042095618-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Harry,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=042095618-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=042095618-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I
agree with Lee. I see no reason to kill the Vancouver meeting. Early May
seems a good rescheduling for the April meeting (although I do not fully
understand on what grounds people dropped out of the April
meeting.)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=042095618-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=042095618-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2> Also, unless it has been changed, I understand that there is
a Microsoft <FONT size=2>Printing and Imaging Conference in Redmond on
June 5-6.</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=042095618-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=042095618-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Bill
Wagner</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Farrell, Lee
[mailto:Lee.Farrell@cda.canon.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, March 26, 2003
1:55 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Harry Lewis; pwg@pwg.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> PWG> RE:
PWG-ANNOUNCE> Rearranging PWG schedule<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Harry,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>What's the fundamental goal here? To revisit the schedule for all
future meetings in the year, or just up to (but not including)
October?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Is
there any reason not to try to "squeeze in" four [newly scheduled] meetings
into the remainder of the year? [For example, June 2-6, August
4-9, October 6-10 (why not still hold this in New York?), and December
1-5 seem reasonable goals for future meetings. Eight week separation on
average, but still allowing four face-to-face meetings for the rest of the
year. </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Given that this organization has already cut down this year's schedule
of meetings to only five, I would think that we should avoid reducing it to
four if we can.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Any
thoughts?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>lee</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=494134118-26032003>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=1>===========================</FONT> <BR><FONT
face=Arial size=1>Lee Farrell</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=1>Canon
Development Americas</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=1>110 Innovation
Drive</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=1>Irvine, CA 92612</FONT>
<BR><FONT face=Arial size=1>(949) 856-7163 - voice</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial
size=1>(949) 856-7510 - fax</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial
size=1>lee.farrell@cda.canon.com</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial
size=1>===========================</FONT> </P></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Harry Lewis
[mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:29
AM<BR><B>To:</B> pwg-announce@pwg.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> PWG-ANNOUNCE>
Rearranging PWG schedule<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR><FONT face=sans-serif
size=2>To recover from cancelation of D.C. I've prepared a scheduling
guide.</FONT> <BR><A
href="ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/misc/DCRecovery.pdf"><FONT
face=sans-serif color=blue
size=2>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/misc/DCRecovery.pdf</FONT></A>
<BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>As you can see, two weeks in June appear
to be the best alternatives. Please identify any conflicts / alignments I have
missed. We need to settle on the next meeting date quickly so people can
reschedule their canceled flights. People flying AA seem to have the shortest
amount of time and we may not be able to reschedule within their 2 day
deadline! In this case I recommend these people reschedule for the Provo
meeting in October. </FONT><BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>PLEASE HOLD
DISCUSSION OF THIS TOPIC ON </FONT><A href="pwg@pwg.org"><FONT face=sans-serif
color=blue size=2>pwg@pwg.org</FONT></A><FONT face=sans-serif size=2> NOT
pwg-announce!</FONT> <BR><BR><FONT face=sans-serif
size=2>---------------------------------------------- <BR>Harry Lewis
</FONT><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>Chairman - ISTO Printer Working
Group<BR>IBM Printing Systems
<BR>----------------------------------------------
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>