attachment-0001
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I like this but I'm under the impression
that these are ISTO IEEE numbers and not sure we can just add the prefix.
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">----------------------------------------------
<br>
Harry Lewis <br>
IBM Printing Systems <br>
---------------------------------------------- </font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com></b></font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: owner-pwg@pwg.org</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">03/13/2003 03:42 PM</font>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial"> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> To:
pwg@pwg.org</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> cc:
</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"> Subject:
RE: PWG> Document numbering - Candidates
vs Standards</font></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=blue face="Arial">An other alternative is to keep
the same number, but have some letter prefixes, such as CS to mean candidate
standard.</font>
<br><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=2 color=blue face="Arial">Thus the official PWG number for
a Candidate Standard versus Standard for Skywritting would be:</font>
<br><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier">Ex CS-5300.1 = Skywriting Print Standard
(Candidate Standard)</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> </font><font size=2 face="Courier"><br>
STD-5350.1 = Skywriting Print Standard (STANDARD)</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">
</font>
<br><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier">For example, I seem to recall that ANSI
standards say BSR nnnn for a draft standard (which stands for Board of
Standard Review, as I recall) while the standard is being voted on.</font>
<br><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier">Tom</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Tahoma"><br>
Original Message-----<b><br>
From:</b> Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]<b><br>
Sent:</b> Thursday, March 13, 2003 13:48<b><br>
To:</b> don@lexmark.com<b><br>
Cc:</b> pwg@pwg.org<b><br>
Subject:</b> PWG> Document numbering - Candidates vs Standards<br>
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Don, we're struggling in the PWG process discussion about ISTO numbers
and when and how they should be assigned in the process. First, we said
no ISTO number until STANDARD. Some feel Candidate Standards should have
numbers and we're considering a hack on the numbering to indicate CS from
STANDARD.</font><font size=3> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="Courier"><br>
Ex 5300.1 = Skywriting Print Standard (Candidate Standard)</font><font size=3>
</font><font size=2 face="Courier"><br>
5350.1 = Skywriting Print Standard (STANDARD)</font><font size=3>
<br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
You (and others) must have experience with IEEE standards progression (1284.x).
Can you shed some light on the IEEE/ISTO numbering, what level of maturity
they expect when a number is assigned, how we might go about assigning
numbers to CS as well as S?</font><font size=3> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
---------------------------------------------- <br>
Harry Lewis <br>
IBM Printing Systems <br>
---------------------------------------------- </font>
<br>