attachment-0001

Correction - voting results were (as confirmed by Ami Patel - ISTO) 7 companies voted yes 1 company abstained 0 companies voted no ---------------------------------------------- Harry Lewis IBM Printing Systems ---------------------------------------------- ----- Forwarded by Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM on 03/13/2003 06:57 AM ----- <table width=100%> <tr valign=top> <td> <td>Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS Sent by: owner-pwg-announce@pwg.org 03/12/2003 10:04 PM <td>                To:        pwg-announce@pwg.org         cc:                 Subject:        PWG-ANNOUNCE> PWG Proposed Standard IPP "-actual" attributes formally APPROVED</table> Voting ended March 7. 5 companies voted yes Zero companies voted no. The IPP "-actual" attributes specification is formally approved as a PWG Proposed Standard based on the existing process. Note that the PWG process is undergoing revision which will likely change the name of this standard to "Candidate Standard" rather than "Proposed". ---------------------------------------------- Harry Lewis IBM Printing Systems ---------------------------------------------- ----- Forwarded by Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM on 03/12/2003 09:40 PM ----- <table width=100%> <tr valign=top> <td width=1%> <td width=18%>Harry Lewis 02/14/2003 11:17 AM <td width=80%>               To:        pwg-announce@pwg.org        cc:                From:        Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS        Subject:        Formal Approval Voting is OPEN for PWG Proposed Standard IPP "-actual" attributes</table> <form action="http://commcenter.attbi.com/wmc/v/wm?cmd=ListManage&sid=c0" method=post>Voting is open for Formal Approval of the PWG Proposed Standard IPP "-actual" attributes. Last call was completed successfully (see below). I was trying to wait for the PWG process update before announcing this vote but I feel the process revision will take longer than anticipated. As the new process is currently defined, this document would become Candidate Standard. Send votes to the ISTO in care of Ami Patel and copy the PWG Chairman, Harry Lewis. Just a reminder - one vote per company. <a href=a.s.patel@ieee.org>a.s.patel@ieee.org</a> <a href=harryl@us.ibm.com>harryl@us.ibm.com</a> Voting ends at 5pm EST on March 7. ---------------------------------------------- Harry Lewis Chairman - ISTO Printer Working Group IBM Printing Systems ---------------------------------------------- ----- Forwarded by Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM on 02/14/2003 11:08 AM ----- <table width=100%> <tr valign=top> <td width=1%> <td width=17%>Dennis Carney 01/31/2003 04:09 PM <td width=81%>        To:        Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS        cc:                From:        Dennis Carney/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS        Subject:        Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Last Call Exit for PWG Proposed Standard IPP "-actual" attributes<a href=Notes:///8525638E00750154/A24CF79FA927570285256356005827C4/7AD5DFAD4EC9F8C287256CBE007C4504>Link</a></table> Harry, I have posted the new version of the "-actual" spec, the one that is ready to be voted on. ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v04-030131-rev.doc ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v04-030131-rev.pdf ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v04-030131.doc ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v04-030131.pdf ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-latest.doc ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-latest.pdf So I guess we can start the vote whenever you'd like. Dennis <table width=100%> <tr valign=top> <td width=1%> <td width=28%>Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS Sent by: owner-pwg-announce@pwg.org 01/30/03 03:32 PM <td width=70%>               To:        pwg-announce@pwg.org        cc:        Dennis Carney/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS        Subject:        PWG-ANNOUNCE> Last Call Exit for PWG Proposed Standard IPP "-actual" attributes </table> Per the PWG process, LAST CALL for the Printer Working Group Proposed Standard for Internet Printing Protocol (IPP):"-actual" attributes has expired today, Jan 30, 2003 at 2200 GMT (5pm in NYC). After incorporating comments from the last call, a VOTE will determine formal approval for moving this document to PROPOSED status as currently defined by the PWG standards track. You can find the last call versions at ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v03-021216.pdf ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_ACT/pwg-ipp-actual-attrs-v03-021216.doc Prior to voting these links will be updated with a revised document that incorporates the last call comments. These comments, and their resolution are listed, below. All comments received were editorial in nature. 1. RFC 2565 and 2566 are obsolete.  It is not appropriate to reference obsolete documents, especially as a normative reference.  See    Line 146  (in section 1  Introduction)    Line 228  (in section 3  -actual attributes)    Line 331 - 336  (in section 7.1  Normative References RESOLUTION - Changed abstract from "...extension to the Internet Printing Protocol/1.0 (IPP/1.0) [RFC2566, RFC2565] & IPP/1.1 [RFC2911, RFC2910]..." to "...extension to the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) (RFC2911, RFC2910)...". - Changed first line of Introduction from "This document specifies an extension to the Internet Printing Protocol/1.0 (IPP) [RFC2565, RFC2566] and IPP/1.1 [RFC2910, RFC2911]. to "This document specifies an extension to the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) [RFC2911, RFC2910]. - Added new 3rd paragraph in Introduction: "This extension is applicable to IPP/1.0 and IPP/1.1, as well as all future IPP/1.x versions." - On line 159, changed from: "In IPP/1.0 and IPP/1.1, it is..." to "In IPP, it is..." - On line 228, changed from: "...in the IPP Model [RFC2566, RFC2911], ..." to "...in the IPP Model [RFC2911], ..." - Moved references to 2565 and 2566 (lines 331-336) from Normative References to new Informative References section (section 7.2). 2. In lines 151 & 152 recommend changing "(or are going to print)" to "(or are expected to be printed)" to be more consistent with the example in section 3.3. RESOLUTION Done 3. In line 239 remove "that has the" and all of the text in the following line.  This additional text adds nothing and results in a sentence that is very difficult to read. RESOLUTION Done 4. In lines 279 and 280 there is a strange split (by WORD) of the string "-attribute". RESOLUTION Fixed 5. The formatting of the document is not per ISTO requirements. Specifically page numbering and headers.  Is there a procedure for format review prior to final publication?  I propose that this needs to be established. RESOLUTION Keeping current formatting for now until new template efforts stabilize. ---------------------------------------------- Harry Lewis Chairman - ISTO Printer Working Group IBM Printing Systems ---------------------------------------------- </form>