attachment
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Sorry I cannot make today's PSX meeting.
I have a conflicting internal DMTF CIM meeting. I have run the options
past IBMers and we prefer options 2 or 3 (not option 1).</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">----------------------------------------------
<br>
Harry Lewis <br>
IBM STSM<br>
Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group<br>
http://www.pwg.org<br>
IBM Printing Systems <br>
http://www.ibm.com/printers<br>
303-924-5337<br>
---------------------------------------------- </font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"McDonald, Ira"
<imcdonald@sharplabs.com></b> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">08/29/2006 07:22 PM</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"'ipp@pwg.org'" <ipp@pwg.org></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">IPP> PSX - Limited Design Alternative
for Device Alerts</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Hi folks,
Tuesday (29 August 2006)<br>
<br>
For consideration at this week's IPP WG telecon, below is a very limited<br>
design alternative for the IPP Printer State Reasons (PSX) project.<br>
<br>
NOTE - This design alternative does NOT satisfy most requirements in<br>
the latest IPP PSX Problem Statement (email note of 14 August 2006):<br>
<br>
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ipp/1282<br>
<br>
Comments?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
- Ira (co-editor of IPP PSX spec)<br>
<br>
<br>
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)<br>
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc<br>
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839<br>
phone: +1-906-494-2434<br>
email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com<br>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS<br>
<br>
The IEEE-ISTO PWG requests comments from BMLinkS consortium members on<br>
the design alternative summarized below. The PWG IPP Working Group
is<br>
at an effective standstill on the IPP Printer State Reasons Extensions<br>
project until a concensus on the design alternatives is reached.<br>
<br>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
LIMITED DESIGN ALTERNATIVE<br>
<br>
(0) 'PrtAlertCode' only mapped to existing IPP "printer-state-reasons"<br>
and no other alert context from 'prtAlertTable' mapped to
IPP<br>
<br>
Syntax:<br>
"printer-state-reasons (1setOf type2 keyword)"<br>
<br>
Example:<br>
printer-state-reason[1] = stitcher-jam<br>
printer-state-reason[2] = wrapper-empty<br>
printer-state-reason[3] = input-media-size-change<br>
<br>
Note:<br>
Finisher MIB uses 'stitcher' (from ISO DPA) instead
of 'stapler'.<br>
<br>
Description:<br>
For existing Printer MIB v1/v2 subunits, we would
add all missing<br>
values of 'PrtAlertCodeTC' enumeration to "printer-state-reasons".<br>
For Finisher MIB devices, we would add all missing
specific values<br>
to 'PrtAlertCodeTC' and "printer-state-reasons"
for the equivalent<br>
alerts (e.g., 'wrapper-empty' but NOT 'wrapper-power-saver').<br>
<br>
Pros:<br>
P0a Simple solution using only registration - no new IPP
attributes.<br>
<br>
P0b Avoids large set of parallel ordered attributes that
would be<br>
fragile for generic IPP parsers.<br>
<br>
P0c Does not require any new formal specification in ABNF.<br>
<br>
Cons:<br>
C0a Forces cross-registration between IANA Printer MIB Registry<br>
'PrtAlertCodeTC' and IANA IPP Registry "printer-state-reasons".<br>
<br>
C0b Forces transforms of the IANA Printer MIB enumeration
tags into<br>
IANA IPP Registry keywords (due to limited
keyword syntax).<br>
<br>
C0c Does NOT support remote provisioning or field service
use cases,<br>
due to lack of alert context (location, group
index, etc.).<br>
<br>
C0d Does NOT support using IPP as a substitute for SNMP Printer
MIB<br>
access for management gateways (for DMTF CIM
or other models).<br>
<br>
C0e Vendor extensions MUST be IANA-registered (inherent limitation<br>
of the IPP 'type2' keyword syntax).<br>
<br>
C0f Results in a very large number of new alert codes (probably<br>
several hundred), mostly unnecessary with all
other PSX design<br>
alternatives (where 'PrtAlertGroupTC' is extended).<br>
<br>
C0g Probable long delay for concensus on the appropriate
set of new<br>
alert codes in (C0f) above would hinder timely
solution.<br>
<br>
------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
-- <br>
No virus found in this outgoing message.<br>
Checked by AVG Free Edition.<br>
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.6/430 - Release Date: 8/28/2006<br>
<br>
</font></tt>
<br>