attachment
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">All:<br>
<br>
This working group has four Internet-Drafts [1] that have been in the "IESG<br>
Evaluation :: Revised ID Needed" state for units measured in years. What<br>
this tells me is that the working group has been unresponsive to IESG review<br>
comments. I have asked the WG chair and at least one editor to review the<br>
IESG comments and update the document as needed, but the response I received<br>
was lukewarm.<br>
<br>
Years is too long. Something has got to change. It's either time to update<br>
the documents, finish them up, and close the working group, or to drop them<br>
entirely and close the working group.<br>
<br>
To that end: I want to see a reply to this note from the WG chair, posted to<br>
this working group mailing list by 0000 UTC Friday 2 July 2004 (a little<br>
more than two weeks from now), describing what the working group intends to<br>
do with each of the four documents. If no such plan is provided, the<br>
working group will be closed due to inactivity and the documents will be<br>
dropped.<br>
<br>
If a plan is provided it must include either a request to drop the document<br>
or a date by which time the document will be updated and sent to the I-D<br>
administrator for publication. You may wish to consider finding new<br>
document editors if the legacy editors are unable to update the documents.<br>
I am willing to work with you on timeframes if the group shows a willingness<br>
to move forward with the needed document updates.<br>
<br>
IESG review comments can be found in the I-D tracker:<br>
<br>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi<br>
<br>
Discussion of possible ways forward is appropriate...<br>
<br>
-Scott-<br>
IESG Applications Area Advisor for IPP<br>
<br>
[1]<br>
draft-ietf-ipp-not-spec-11.txt<br>
draft-ietf-ipp-ops-set2-03.txt<br>
draft-ietf-ipp-not-06.txt<br>
draft-ietf-ipp-notify-get-09.txt<br>
<br>
<br>
</font>
<br>