attachment-0001
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2722.900" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=152215815-21082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>I am glad to hear that this question was resolved
long ago.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=152215815-21082003></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=152215815-21082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Bill
Wagner</FONT> </SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> TAYLOR,BOB
(HP-Vancouver,ex1) [mailto:bobt@hp.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 21,
2003 11:13 AM<BR><B>To:</B> Wagner,William; Harry Lewis; TAYLOR,BOB
(HP-Vancouver,ex1)<BR><B>Cc:</B> IPP@pwg.org;
printing-driver@freestandards.org; printing-jobticket@freestandards.org;
Zehler, Peter<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [printing-jobticket] RE:
[printing-driver] RE: IPP> Print Quality Issue
resolution<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=822260615-21082003><FONT face="Courier New" color=#0000ff
size=2>Looking at the dates, it looks to me that some of Harry's email to the
<FONT face=Tahoma color=#000000>[printing-jobticket] list just got un-stuck in
some email server: these are over a month old.</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=822260615-21082003><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=822260615-21082003><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>bt</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Wagner,William
[mailto:WWagner@NetSilicon.com] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, August 21, 2003
6:28 AM<BR><B>To:</B> Harry Lewis; TAYLOR,BOB
(HP-Vancouver,ex1)<BR><B>Cc:</B> IPP@pwg.org;
printing-driver@freestandards.org; printing-jobticket@freestandards.org;
Zehler, Peter<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [printing-jobticket] RE:
[printing-driver] RE: IPP> Print Quality Issue
resolution<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=450381513-21082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>It
is quite a surprise to see this discussion still going on. When the idea of
two varaiables was brought up in Portland, it seemed quite reasonable. At
least with the implementations I am aware of, the techniques
for quality improvement (e.g., increased pseudo-resolution) are different
with the techniques for marker saving (bias voltage
adjustment, sparse writing in solid areas). Further, although
there is interaction in the effect upon the output, the user
motivation in selecting quality level is more likely to be
speed while the motivation for marker saving is cost. As
is suggested, each marketing group will put is own spin on these
variables, but I do think that having two variables makes
sense.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=450381513-21082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=450381513-21082003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Bill Wagner</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Harry Lewis
[mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, July 14, 2003 6:05
PM<BR><B>To:</B> TAYLOR,BOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1)<BR><B>Cc:</B> IPP
Discussion List (IPP@pwg.org); printing-driver@freestandards.org;
printing-jobticket@freestandards.org; Zehler, Peter<BR><B>Subject:</B>
[printing-jobticket] RE: [printing-driver] RE: IPP> Print Quality Issue
resolution<BR><BR></FONT></DIV><BR><FONT face="Courier New" color=blue
size=2>>My main question with TonerSaving/InkSaving/MarkerSaving is how
this is any different than PrintQuality(High|Normal|Draft)</FONT>
<BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>To answer this question, straightforward,
there are implementations where you can select High|Normal|Draft
independently from "Saver". Administrators may want to configure
policy that "Saving" must always be on yet still allow the choice of
High|Normal|Draft, within that context. </FONT><BR><BR><FONT
face="Courier New" color=blue size=2>>PrintQuality=High &
MarkerSaving=False would seem to say "print in high quality, and waste
toner/ink for no good reason</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2>I
think people would expect:</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif
size=2> PQ=High|Saving=Off to result in the BEST possible quality.
</FONT><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2> PQ=High|Saving=On to result
in the best possible quality while still saving marker (toner, ink
...)</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2> PQ=Draft|Saving=Off to
result in the FASTEST possible printing</FONT> <BR><FONT face=sans-serif
size=2> PQ=Draft|Saving=On to result in the fastest possible printing
with legibility that may not stand up to close scrutiny because marker
(toner, ink...) has been used sparingly. </FONT><BR><BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2>----------------------------------------------
<BR>Harry Lewis <BR>Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working
Group<BR>http://www.pwg.org<BR>IBM Printing Systems
<BR>http://www.ibm.com/printers<BR>303-924-5337<BR>----------------------------------------------
</FONT><BR><BR><BR>
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD width="40%"><FONT face=sans-serif size=1><B>"TAYLOR,BOB
(HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <bobt@hp.com></B> </FONT><BR><FONT
face=sans-serif size=1>Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org</FONT>
<P><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>07/14/2003 02:36 PM</FONT> </P>
<TD width="59%">
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>To</FONT></DIV>
<TD vAlign=top><FONT face=sans-serif
size=1>printing-driver@freestandards.org, "Zehler, Peter"
<PZehler@crt.xerox.com></FONT>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>cc</FONT></DIV>
<TD vAlign=top><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>"IPP Discussion
List (IPP@pwg.org)" <IPP@pwg.org>,
printing-jobticket@freestandards.org</FONT>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif
size=1>Subject</FONT></DIV>
<TD vAlign=top><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>RE:
[printing-driver] RE: IPP> Print Quality Issue
resolution</FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>
<TABLE>
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD>
<TD></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><BR><BR><FONT
face="Courier New" color=blue size=2>My main question with
TonerSaving/InkSaving/MarkerSaving is how this is any different than
PrintQuality(High|Normal|Draft). We as well have nifty algorithms
for saving "marker" without impacting quality - but I don't know why we'd
ever want to turn it "off" seperately from the notion of
PQ/performance/economy tradeoff (which I maintain is what PrintQuality
actually is). The semantics of this as a separate attribute seem
somewhat odd to me - i.e., PrintQuality=High & MarkerSaving=False
would seem to say "print in high quality, and waste toner/ink for no good
reason", and PrintQuality=Draft & MarkerSaving=False would seem to say
"print in poor quality, but waste tone/ink anyway". IMHO, a
"separate" TonerSaving mode is really a vendor-specific extension of
PrintQuality, which as Ira noted as already supported (though they are
supposed to be IANA-registered, which I'm guessing most vendors have not
bothered to do).</FONT> <BR><FONT size=3> </FONT> <BR><FONT
face="Courier New" color=blue size=2>thanks,</FONT> <BR><FONT
size=3> </FONT> <BR><FONT face="Courier New" color=blue
size=2>bt</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original
Message-----<B><BR>From:</B> Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]
<B><BR>Sent:</B> Friday, July 11, 2003 6:49 AM<B><BR>To:</B> Zehler,
Peter<B><BR>Cc:</B> IPP Discussion List (IPP@pwg.org);
printing-driver@freestandards.org; printing-jobticket@freestandards.org;
Zehler, Peter<B><BR>Subject:</B> [printing-driver] RE: IPP> Print
Quality Issue resolution<BR></FONT><BR><FONT face=sans-serif size=2><BR>My
concern is that "save toner" is probably the most concrete concept
compared to "Good, Better, Best" or "Text, Image, Graphics". The later has
efficient application only in special cases (some of which may be very
significant, like printing photo's). Otherwise, people stare at their
mixed object document and wonder. I feel "save toner" should be explicit.
</FONT><FONT size=3><BR></FONT><FONT face=sans-serif size=2><BR>We went
from a flat set of descriptors to a pairing.. perhaps we should really go
to a matrix (although I don't like the perceived complexity)</FONT><FONT
size=3> <BR></FONT><FONT face=Courier size=2><BR>Good - Better -
Best</FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT><FONT face=Courier size=2><BR>Text -
Text+Graphics - Graphics - Image</FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT><FONT
face=Courier size=2><BR>TonerSaving</FONT><FONT size=3> <BR></FONT><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2><BR>----------------------------------------------
<BR>Harry Lewis <BR>Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working
Group<BR>http://www.pwg.org<BR>IBM Printing Systems
<BR>http://www.ibm.com/printers<BR>303-924-5337<BR>----------------------------------------------
</FONT><FONT size=3><BR><BR></FONT>
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD width="27%"><FONT face=sans-serif size=1><B>"Zehler, Peter"
<PZehler@crt.xerox.com></B> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>07/11/2003 04:54 AM</FONT><FONT
size=3> </FONT></P>
<TD width="72%"><BR>
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD width="13%">
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>To</FONT></DIV>
<TD vAlign=top width="86%"><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>Harry
Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS, "Zehler, Peter"
<PZehler@crt.xerox.com></FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>cc</FONT></DIV>
<TD vAlign=top><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>"IPP Discussion
List (IPP@pwg.org)" <IPP@pwg.org>,
printing-driver@freestandards.org,
printing-jobticket@freestandards.org</FONT><FONT size=3>
</FONT>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif
size=1>Subject</FONT></DIV>
<TD vAlign=top><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>RE: IPP> Print
Quality Issue resolution</FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><BR>
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD width="49%">
<TD
width="50%"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><FONT
size=3><BR><BR></FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#000080
size=2><BR>Harry,</FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT><FONT face=Arial
color=#000080 size=2><BR>We felt that there are many different attributes
involved in heuristics for saving toner and printing fast. Some of
those are "resolution", "media" and aspects of the document content.
We felt the requirements were met by keeping the existing
"print-quality" values and augmenting them with hints on how to process
the document content to achieve 'draft' 'normal' and 'high'. The
assumption is that draft is fastest and uses the least toner.</FONT><FONT
size=3> </FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2><BR>Pete</FONT><FONT
size=3> </FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2><BR></FONT><FONT
size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Impact color=#000080 size=3>Peter Zehler</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" color=#000080 size=3> </FONT><FONT color=red
size=3><BR>XEROX</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000080 size=3>
</FONT><FONT face=Tahoma color=#000080 size=2><BR>Xerox Innovation
Group</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000080 size=3>
</FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2><BR>Email:
PZehler@crt.xerox.com</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000080
size=3> </FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2><BR>Voice: (585)
265-8755</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000080 size=3>
</FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2><BR>FAX: (585)
422-</FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2>7961</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" color=#000080 size=3> </FONT><FONT face=Arial
color=#000080 size=2><BR>US Mail: Peter Zehler</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" color=#000080 size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2> Xerox
Corp.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000080 size=3>
</FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2><BR> 800
Phillips Rd.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000080 size=3>
</FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2><BR> M/S
128-25E</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000080 size=3>
</FONT><FONT face=Arial color=#000080 size=2><BR>
Webster NY, 14580-9701</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#000080
size=3> </FONT><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><BR>-----Original
Message-----<B><BR>From:</B> Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]
<B><BR>Sent:</B> Thursday, July 10, 2003 11:26 PM<B><BR>To:</B> Zehler,
Peter<B><BR>Cc:</B> IPP Discussion List (IPP@pwg.org);
printing-driver@freestandards.org;
printing-jobticket@freestandards.org<B><BR>Subject:</B> Re: IPP> Print
Quality Issue resolution</FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3><BR></FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT><FONT
face=sans-serif size=2><BR><BR>> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>We finally agreed that the two values</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>'save-toner' and</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>
</FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>'speed' are implied by
the</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>"print-quality".</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>Since they were not required, they were removed.</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face=sans-serif
size=2><BR><BR>I think this warrants further examination. I have known
toner saving methods that do a very good job of preserving print quality.
<BR>---------------------------------------------- <BR>Harry Lewis
<BR>Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working
Group<BR>http://www.pwg.org<BR>IBM Printing Systems
<BR>http://www.ibm.com/printers<BR>303-924-5337<BR>----------------------------------------------
</FONT>
<P>
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD width="27%"><FONT face=sans-serif size=1><B>"Zehler, Peter"
<PZehler@crt.xerox.com></B> <BR>Sent by:
owner-ipp@pwg.org</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>07/10/2003 01:41 PM</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT></P>
<TD width="72%"><BR>
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD width="13%">
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>To</FONT></DIV>
<TD vAlign=top width="86%"><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>"IPP
Discussion List (IPP@pwg.org)" <IPP@pwg.org>,
printing-jobticket@freestandards.org,
printing-driver@freestandards.org</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>cc</FONT></DIV>
<TD vAlign=top><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV align=right><FONT face=sans-serif
size=1>Subject</FONT></DIV>
<TD vAlign=top><FONT face=sans-serif size=1>IPP> Print
Quality Issue resolution</FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3><BR></FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT>
<P><BR>
<TABLE width="100%">
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD width="61%"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT>
<TD width="38%"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR></P></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<P><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><BR><BR></FONT><FONT face=Arial
size=2><BR><BR>All,</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>During the PWG/FSG meeting in Portland
we had a discussion about the IPP</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>"print-quality" attribute
and FSG's desire to add two new values,</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>'economy' and</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>'fine', where</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>
</FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>'economy' is lower than</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>'draft' and</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>'fine' is higher than</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>'high'.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>The FSG further proposed the addition of a new
attribute, called</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>"print-optimize", that</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>would augment</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>
</FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>"print-quality" with values
of</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>'image',</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>'photo',</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>'text',</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>'text-and-image',</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>'save-toner' and</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>
</FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>'speed'.</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>With regard to</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>'economy' and</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>
</FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>'fine', we agreed that</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>'economy' would map to</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>
</FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>"print-quality"='draft'
and</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>'fine' to</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>"print-quality"='high'.
There may be end user</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>
</FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>visible features that map to
multiple</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>attributes. We leave it to specific
print</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>domains to</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>model these higher
level</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>aggregate</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>features. When
appropriate we will add needed elements to the Semantic Model.</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>There was a lot of push back
on</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>"print-optimize". The main concern was
that</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>"print-optimize" contained a mixed bag of items.
The two main categories were content metadata and</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>rendering hints. We finally agreed that the two
values</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>'save-toner' and</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>'speed' are implied by the</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>"print-quality".</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>
</FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>Since they were not required,
they were removed. The remaining values are needed to direct the
type of optimization/processing that will be performed on the content.
It does not necessarily mean the</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>value describes
the</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>content. </FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>To clarify this we
changed the attribute name to</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>
</FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>"print-content-optimize".
</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT
face="Courier New" size=2>Finally the value</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New"
size=2>'image' seemed the same as</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>'photo'. The name for
this was changed to</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3>
</FONT><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>'graphic'.</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>As a result the following attribute
will be added to the JobX specification in it next revision.</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2> print-content-optimize
(type2 keyword)</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2> This attribute
refines the value specified by the print-quality</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>
attribute.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2> The standard
keyword values are:</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>
'graphic': optimize for graphic clarity</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>
'photo': optimize for photo clarity</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>
'text': optimize for text clarity</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Courier New" size=2>
'text-and-graphic': optimize for both text and graphic
clarity</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Impact size=3>Peter Zehler</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=red size=3>XEROX</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>Xerox Innovation Group</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Email: PZehler@crt.xerox.com</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>Voice: (585) 265-8755</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>FAX: (585)
422-7961</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>US Mail: Peter Zehler</FONT><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2> Xerox
Corp.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2> 800 Phillips
Rd.</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2> M/S
128-25E</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2> Webster NY,
14580-9701</FONT><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3> </FONT>
<P></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>