attachment-0001

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2654.45"> <TITLE>Remaining issue in Document object spec</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> All, I did not capture the resolution (if any) on the following issue from Dennis Carney. ISSUE: I definitely believe that we need a "Document-equivalent" of job-collation-type.  It would have different semantics, since the Job level semantics include the concept of documents, but I believe that since it is useful to know whether a Job is doing collated or uncollated copies, it would also be useful to know the same for Documents. Proposed resolutions: <TH>I disagree.  If we did add a Document attribute, it would need to have the same value as at the Job Level, since you can't collate some documents and not collate other documents in the same job.  We don't duplicate on the Document object other Job level attributes that apply to the job as a whole, such as "job-name", "job-hold", "job-priority", "job-finishing".</TH> Before I put the updated document I would like to get consensus.  Please respond on the IPP list. Opinions? Pete <UL><UL><UL><UL> <A NAME="_MailAutoSig">Peter Zehler</A> XEROX Xerox Innovation Group Email: PZehler@crt.xerox.com Voice:    (585) 265-8755 FAX:      (585) 422-7961 US Mail: Peter Zehler <UL>         Xerox Corp.         800 Phillips Rd.         M/S 128-25E         Webster NY, 14580-9701 </UL></UL></UL></UL></UL> </BODY> </HTML>