attachment
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2715.400" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=014192115-20052002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Bob,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=014192115-20052002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff><SPAN class=014192115-20052002><FONT face=Arial
size=2>Was it added as a generic term for any type of binding (e.g. tape, coil
binding, plastic comb) without identifying the bound edge ?
I am not aware of the value 'bind' being used for "finishings" in any
implementation. Any Printer that offers finishing normally describes the
type of finishing with a specific value instead of the generic 'bind'. (see
</FONT></SPAN><SPAN class=014192115-20052002><FONT face=Arial size=2><A
href="ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/standards/pwg5100.1.pdf">ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/standards/pwg5100.1.pdf</A>)
This spec resolves the bind location but still does not qualify the type of
binding. Do we need to add some new values/qualifiers to the PWG
model?</FONT></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN
class=014192115-20052002></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=014192115-20052002><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Pete</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<UL>
<UL>
<UL>
<UL>
<P><FONT face=Impact>Peter Zehler</FONT> <BR><FONT face=XeroxPeopleNet
color=#ff0000>XEROX</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>Xerox
Architecture Center</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>Email:
PZehler@crt.xerox.com</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial color=#000000
size=2>Voice: (716) 265-8755</FONT> <BR><FONT
face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>FAX: (716)
265-8871</FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2> </FONT><BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2>US Mail: Peter Zehler</FONT>
<UL>
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2>
Xerox Corp.</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2> 800 Phillips
Rd.</FONT> <BR><FONT face=Arial
size=2> M/S 128-30E</FONT>
<BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>
Webster NY, 14580-9701</FONT> </P></UL></UL></UL></UL></UL>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Robert Herriot
[mailto:bob@herriot.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, May 19, 2002 3:58
AM<BR><B>To:</B> ipp@pwg.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> IPP> The "bind" value of
the "finishings" attribute<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>An issue has come up in another standards effort
which is trying to map IPP attributes. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT size=2>The question is about t</FONT><FONT
size=2>he "bind" value of the IPP "finishings" attribute. It is the least
specific value of "finishings".</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Does anyone remember why the "bind" value of the
"finishings" attribute was put into IPP? </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Does anyone implement it?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Bob Herriot</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>