attachment
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">All,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I agree with Randy that the goals and
objectives of the various bodies should not overlap. The goals and
objectives of the TCG HCWG need to be complementary to those of the P2600
and PWG IDS groups.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">dhw</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">David H. Whitehead<br>
Development Engineer<br>
Lexmark International, Inc.<br>
859.825.4914<br>
davidatlexmarkdotcom</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Randy Turner"
<rturner@amalfisystems.com></b> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: owner-ids@pwg.org</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">04/10/09 01:01 AM</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><STDS-2600@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><ids@pwg.org></font>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif">IDS> minutes from April 8 2009 TCG
HCWG charter discussion teleconference</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>Hi All,<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>After reading the minutes from the latest TCG HCWG
re-chartering discussion,<br>
I have the following comment...<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>I think, at a minimum, any new charter for the TCG
HCWG should be filtered<br>
through the goals and objectives of the p2600 work<br>
and the PWG-IDS activity to determine any new objectives.<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>in other words,<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>o1 = set of p2600 goals and objectives (both core
standard and protection<br>
profiles)<br>
o2 = set of PWG IDS goals and objectives (including NEA/TNC + IDS<br>
attributes)<br>
o3 = The union of o1 and o2 (i.e., o1 U o2)<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>o4 = The set of proposed TCG HCWG goals and objectives<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>The intersection of o3 and o4 should be the empty
set<br>
</font></tt>
<br><tt><font size=2>Thanks,<br>
Randy<br>
</font></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>----- Original Message -----<br>
From: "Brian Smithson" <brian.smithson@RICOH-USA.COM><br>
To: <STDS-2600@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG><br>
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:13 PM<br>
Subject: [2600] minutes from April 8 2009 TCG HCWG charter discussion<br>
teleconference<br>
</font></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>> Please see the attached meeting minutes from
yesterday's teleconference<br>
> discussion of the TCG Hardcopy Workgroup charter revision.<br>
><br>
> Many thanks to Shah Bhatti for leading the discussion, Seigo Kotani
for<br>
> acting as interim chair and BoD liaison, Steve Hanna for providing<br>
> perspective from the TNC WG, and Lee Farrell for contributing his<br>
> excellent notes to the production of these minutes.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Regards,<br>
> Brian Smithson<br>
> PM, Security Research<br>
> PMP, CISSP, CISA, ISO 27000 PA<br>
> Advanced Imaging and Network Technologies<br>
> Ricoh Americas Corporation<br>
> (408)346-4435<br>
><br>
></font></tt>
<br>
<br>