attachment

<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div> </div>Hi Dave,<div> </div><div>I would be *interesting* to hear comments from a broader industry collective, like NEA, but I think it would be a mistake to predicate responses from the broader audience on completing an internal PWG or IDS last call process.  </div><div> </div><div>To paraphrase, I wouldn't make responses from external review necessary to complete last call processes.</div><div> </div><div>To use Lee's phrase, from a NEA WG priority, we're probably not "on their radar" at the moment - with TNC protocols already deployed, there is some consideration being given to complete the initial NEA docs as soon as possible, so that NEA can "catch up" to the market into which TNC, Cisco, and NAP have already deployed.</div><div> </div><div>I will ask Steve (Hanna) if he thinks it's appropriate at this juncture to ask the NEA WG to provide comment on our documents.  </div><div> </div><div>Randy</div><div> </div><div> <div><div>On Mar 13, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Dave Whitehead wrote:</div> <blockquote type="cite"> Lee, Randy, If I remember correctly, we wanted to present our attribute definitions to some knowledgeable people within the NEA group and solicit feedback.  We knew the meeting was coming up and (I think) Randy said he was going and would distribute our document.  Basically, we were hoping for feedback before our last call process ended. dhw David H. Whitehead Development Engineer Lexmark International, Inc. 859.825.4914 davidatlexmarkdotcom <table width="100%"> <tbody><tr valign="top"> <td width="40%">"Farrell, Lee" <<a href="mailto:Lee.Farrell@cda.canon.com">Lee.Farrell@cda.canon.com</a>> Sent by: <a href="mailto:owner-ids@pwg.org">owner-ids@pwg.org</a>03/13/09 03:18 PM </td><td width="59%"> <table width="100%"> <tbody><tr valign="top"> <td> <div align="right">To</div> </td><td><<a href="mailto:ids@pwg.org">ids@pwg.org</a>> </td></tr><tr valign="top"> <td> <div align="right">cc</div> </td><td> </td></tr><tr valign="top"> <td> <div align="right">Subject</div> </td><td>RE: IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC and PB-TNC</td></tr></tbody></table> <table> <tbody><tr valign="top"> <td> </td><td></td></tr></tbody></table> </td></tr></tbody></table> Hi Randy,   At the IDS telecon yesterday, I just got the sense that  there was something that people were expecting from the NEA group.  Maybe I  misunderstood.  If the only item is approval of the PA-TNC (with the  attributes that were introduced), then I guess we're  covered.   By "on their radar", I was looking for some agenda item  referring to the PWG or "printing".    Perhaps I was being too  explicit in my expectations for their agenda.    lee <hr> From: Randy Turner  [<a href="mailto:rturner@amalfisystems.com">mailto:rturner@amalfisystems.com</a>] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009  12:05 PM To: Farrell, Lee Cc:  <a href="mailto:ids@pwg.org">ids@pwg.org</a> Subject: Re: IDS> FW: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC  and PB-TNC Hi Lee, If you have something to discuss, you can bring it up during the Agenda  bashing session  - I think we've already made our proposal and portions  of it were introduced into the PA-TNC document in a previous draft - I'm not  sure what you mean by "on their radar".   Randy On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Farrell, Lee wrote: The NEA is holding their  meeting on the 23rd, and the agenda is focusing on a review of comments on the latest  two draft documents: Agenda for IETF 74 NEA  WG meeting ================================= Date: Monday, March  23, 2009 Time: 1300-1500 PDT (GMT-0700) WG Charter: <a href="http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/nea-charter.html">http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/nea-charter.html</a> WG  Tools: <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/nea</a> WG  email: <a href="mailto:nea@ietf.org">nea@ietf.org</a> 1300  Administrivia          Blue  Sheets          Jabber &  Minute scribes          Agenda  bashing 1305 WG Status 1310 Discuss PB-TNC (recent changes and WGLC  comments)        <a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-03.txt">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-03.txt</a> 1400 Discuss PA-TNC (recent changes and WGLC  comments)        <a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-03.txt">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-03.txt</a> 1450 Review and Revise Milestones 1500 Adjourn What information exactly is it  that the IDS group would like to have discussed by and/or proposed to this  group?  It does not appear that they have us on their radar, nor am I  aware of any recent communication from the IDS group to  them. lee -----Original  Message----- From: <a href="mailto:nea-bounces@ietf.org">nea-bounces@ietf.org</a>  [<a href="mailto:nea-bounces@ietf.org">mailto:nea-bounces@ietf.org</a>] On Behalf Of Stephen  Hanna Sent:  Friday, March 06, 2009 1:29 PM To: <a href="mailto:nea@ietf.org">nea@ietf.org</a> Subject: [Nea] Starting WGLC for PA-TNC  and PB-TNC New versions of PA-TNC and  PB-TNC have been posted. These include all changes for which there was WG consensus. All open  issues are now closed. The new documents are available at these  URLs: <a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-03.txt">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-03.txt</a> <a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-03.txt">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-03.txt</a> Therefore, I am starting a  Working Group Last Call on these documents. Please review them and send any  comments or questions to the <a href="mailto:nea@ietf.org">nea@ietf.org</a>  email list. This Working Group Last Call  will close at 5 PM EST on Friday, March 20, 2009. We have chosen a two week WGLC  period so that we can have all comments received and ready to discuss before  the NEA meeting at IETF 74. However, if you feel that two weeks is not  enough time, please email the NEA list and we will consider an  extension. In any case, now is the time for  all NEA WG participants to perform a careful review of these specifications  and raise any comments, concerns, corrections, or questions that you may  have. Please take the time to do so before the end of  WGLC. Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ Nea mailing list <a href="mailto:Nea@ietf.org">Nea@ietf.org</a> <a href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea</a> </blockquote></div> </div></body></html>