attachment
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>Oct Face-to-face Action Items -- overlooked?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Hello everyone,</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">After our teleconference today, I noted from the October face-to-face Minutes that a few Action Items had not been transferred to the November 6 teleconference Minutes -- and may have "slipped through the cracks." It appears that some of the items about Microsoft may have been enveloped in Dave's current set of questions to Microsoft in one of his Action Items, but I'm not sure that they all were.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Also, I noted that the first Action Item (Randy's) that we discussed today had been<B><I> </I></B></FONT><B><I><FONT COLOR="#FF0000" SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">CLOSED</FONT></I></B><I></I><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial"> at that meeting. Today we identified it as "ongoing", but I wonder if the third Action Item below might be the more appropriate one to reference instead.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">For future discussion and resolution, the items are:</FONT>
</P>
<UL>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">ACTION: Ron Bergman will send an email to Mike Fenelon and Jerry Thrasher to query the issue about how to get NAP attributes registered with Microsoft.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">ACTION: Dave Whitehead will attempt to obtain answers from Microsoft to the following questions:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial"> </FONT> <FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Tahoma">•</FONT><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial"> Because there are multiple assessment protocols, is it conceivable that multiple assessment protocols run simultaneously</FONT><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Tahoma">—</FONT><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">with each requiring independent (i.e., redundant) assessment?</FONT></P>
<P> <FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Tahoma">•</FONT><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial"> How does Microsoft envision the process for remediation?</FONT>
<BR> <FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Tahoma">•</FONT><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial"> Does Microsoft have any plans for a gateway between NAP and NEA?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">ACTION: Randy Turner will try to find other contacts that would be willing to work with the PWG to help deploy NEA health assessment. (Juniper, Symantec, Cisco are suggested candidates.) Is someone willing to sit down with the PWG and “have discussions”?</FONT></P>
<BR>
</UL>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">lee</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Courier New">===========================</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Courier New">Lee Farrell</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Courier New">Canon Development Americas</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Courier New">15975 Alton Parkway</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Courier New">Irvine, CA 92618-3731</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Courier New">(949) 932-3163 - voice</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Courier New">(949) 932-3520 - fax</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Courier New">lee.farrell@cda.canon.com</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=1 FACE="Courier New">===========================</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>