attachment

<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)"> <base href="x-msg://239/">  <style>  </style> </head> <body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space;-webkit-line-break: after-white-space'> <div class=Section1> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Cambria><span style='font-size: 12.0pt;font-family:Cambria;color:blue'>Mike,<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Cambria><span style='font-size: 12.0pt;font-family:Cambria;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Cambria><span style='font-size: 12.0pt;font-family:Cambria;color:blue'>Sorry, I don’t agree.  I see no reason to extend or broaden or cripple the definition imaging when print, scan, copy are well defined and understood all.  Also, you want to include projectors and displays but they are like printers, scanners or copiers.  MFD don’t do video, audio and the other technologies involved in modern projectors and displays.   Your definition is growing to include any attached device.  I support focusing on “Printing” which the PWG name implies we are working instead of add more and different technologies.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Cambria><span style='font-size: 12.0pt;font-family:Cambria;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Cambria><span style='font-size: 12.0pt;font-family:Cambria;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Cambria><span style='font-size: 12.0pt;font-family:Cambria;color:blue'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <div> <div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> <hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1> </span></font></div> <p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet@apple.com] <br> <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Friday, April 15, 2011 2:31 PM<br> <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> Petrie, Glen<br> <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Cc:</span></b> cloud@pwg.org<br> <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [Cloud] Fwd: NIST cloud defs</span></font><o:p></o:p></p> </div> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size: 12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <div> <div> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size: 12.0pt'>On Apr 15, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Petrie, Glen wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> </div> <blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt' type=cite><span style='orphans: 2;text-align:-webkit-auto;widows: 2;-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;word-spacing: 0px'> <div link=blue vlink=blue style='word-wrap: break-word;-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space'> <div> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=blue face=Cambria><span style='font-size: 12.0pt;font-family:Cambria;color:blue'>Michael,  I been investigating “Cloud Imaging” on the WWW.   Beyond referring to actual imaging of clouds; it appears that Cloud Imaging is associated with actual “images” (photo, picture, …) and not with printing (scanning, copying).</span></font><o:p></o:p></p> </div> </div> </blockquote> </span> <div> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size: 12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> </div> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size: 12.0pt'>Given that we are basically including file transformations as part of the functional model, and that our definition of imaging devices includes projectors and displays as well as hardcopy devices, I don't see a conflict here. We certainly have a broader definition of imaging than most, but people *will* find us if they search - particularly since I expect most of our documents and are going to include the words "cloud" and "printing", "scanning", "fax", etc. as we define those services.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> </div> <div> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size: 12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> </div> <div><span style='orphans: 2;text-align:-webkit-auto;widows: 2;-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;word-spacing: 0px'> <div> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=4 color=black face=Helvetica><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black'>__________________________________________________<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> </div> <div> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=4 color=black face=Helvetica><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black'>Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> </div> </div> <p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size: 12.0pt'></span><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> </div> <br />-- <br />This message has been scanned for viruses and <br />dangerous content by <a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is <br />believed to be clean. </body> </html>