From wamwagner at comcast.net Tue Jul 28 17:48:25 2020 From: wamwagner at comcast.net (wamwagner at comcast.net) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:48:25 -0400 Subject: [PWG] [SC] Proposed SC agenda for 07/27/20 In-Reply-To: <7C94AB98-AACE-4919-B9DB-E9C6AC4353D0@msweet.org> References: <10547ADF-D5DB-4E43-BA29-AB4E1A00149D@hp.com> <5287DD1E-21E6-4BB0-B9C9-40041A041376@hp.com> <7C94AB98-AACE-4919-B9DB-E9C6AC4353D0@msweet.org> Message-ID: <20200728174827.B715411AA5@mail.pwg.org> Although I was thinking of using roles in a general sense as the actors in Use Cases, using a set of defined roles might be better. I seem to recall an effort, sometime in the past, to generate a full set of roles associated with imaging services. I don?t recall if this was part of some specification or a separate effort, or indeed how complete the set was. A stroll though the memory lane of the FTP site was amusing but unsuccessful. Anyone have a notion of where/when/what about that role defining effort? Thanks, Bill Wagner -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: